@Right_in_Virginia
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1336161955845959680
There lies the predicament, and why I am so pessimistic about this whole shit show. I don't think there is anyone on the SC willing to risk a civil war by invalidating the election.
Wow. We're so programmed to accept we're the ones who will get the shaft that no one, including us, worry about a civil war if a stolen election is invalidated. How'd we get this way?
That is why I am thinking there might be some kind of SC ruling to the effect that states there was wide spread fraud conducted by he democratic party through criminial activities. Looking at the path to 270, the closest distance is a deficit of (AZ 11K votes, 11EV, GA 12K votes, 16 EV's PA 82K votes, 20 EV's). Somehow proving 105K votes were stolen over 3 states with 100% proof is going to be almost impossible.
It may all be moot
@catfish1957 but the threshold is preponderance of the evidence, not 100% proof. But the PA case is not about fraud, it's about whether or not PA broke with their constitution when election officials changed the rules for mail-in ballots without the legislature --- which is why I'm hoping a remedy could include returning the selection of electors to them.
In any case this would throw serious doubt on the Biden legitimacy, while allowing the president to save face. It might be a shallow victory, but maybe our only option.
I think Biden's legitimacy will be dictated by the media/press, and we can count on any SC rebuke vanishing into thin air. Whatever happens, the President will be painted as a petulant, sore loser because I have my doubts Trump will concede, regardless.
I still want at least one question answered: "Why did five states simultaneously stop counting on election night". I really need an answer to this.