Author Topic: Dallas Police Dept. implements ‘duty to intervene’ policy  (Read 953 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 413,704
OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 10:30 AM PT — Sunday, June 7, 2020

The chief of police in Dallas has announced a new policy to expand officer accountability. Chief Renee Hall implemented the ‘duty to intervene’ policy on Thursday, which encourages department members to intervene when fellow officers are using excessive force.



Protesters across the country have been calling for dramatic police reform in the wake of George Floyd’s death. Many demonstrators have criticized the officers who didn’t intervene during the altercation.

However, some have said a policy change will not be enough to truly make a difference in police brutality.

“After reviewing thousands of policies in my 22-year career as a criminologist, I can tell you that policies are only as good as they are enforced,” stated criminologist Alex Del Carmen.

more
https://www.oann.com/dallas-police-dept-implements-duty-to-intervene-policy/
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"
Mark Twain


“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34


Smokin Joe: Stupid people vote. If you have enough of them, you don’t need to steal an election

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 65,483
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
On its surface, it sounds like a good policy.  It's the logical extension of the Honor Code that starts off with "I will never lie..." and finishes with "...and I won't tolerate those who do."
I don’t owe tolerance to people who disagree with my existence.
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,429
On its surface, it sounds like a good policy.  It's the logical extension of the Honor Code that starts off with "I will never lie..." and finishes with "...and I won't tolerate those who do."
I smell a RAT.

Like so many things like the many saying falsehoods they were raped, this can bring out the absolute worst in some people.

If a policy like this is implemented, it is necessary to dole out similar punishment to those who spread falsehoods as those who are actually guilty.
“You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.” Thomas Sowell

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 65,483
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
I smell a RAT.

Like so many things like the many saying falsehoods they were raped, this can bring out the absolute worst in some people.

If a policy like this is implemented, it is necessary to dole out similar punishment to those who spread falsehoods as those who are actually guilty.

Absolutely true right there.  A malicious accusation should be rewarded with the same punishment being asked for.  If a man or woman falsely claims a rape, he/she needs to spend years in the slammer.
I don’t owe tolerance to people who disagree with my existence.
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,360
  • Gender: Male
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
This policy might have saved the life of white, mentally ill Kelly Thomas, in Fullerton CA.

Killed by police, who were found not guilty by a jury.

I watched the entire video, and at no time did Kelly present a threat to the police. They simply meted out punishment.

Had one been trained he had to stop it, he likely would have lived.

Kelly's father was retired LEO

 
"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln