@Axeslinger Only with regards to the general public is panic an issue. The healthcare system decisions are being based on my points I laid out before. Panic and sound healthcare solvency decisions are not mutually exclusive
No, the health care industry has a different kind of panic - frozen in the headlights. They see it coming, and as a body, refuse to act. They WILL get run over.
While what you say is true, you are still ignoring the burden on the system. From the CDC: “Among U.S. COVID-19 cases with known disposition, the proportion of persons who were hospitalized was 19%. The proportion of persons with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) was 6%â€
My friend THAT is not the common cold. In a population where the transmission is accelerating up the bell curve like a bat outta hell, just these two points alone make this a potentially catastrophic situation. Period. Full stop.
So do nothing? That's better? Just freeze everything and wait to get hit by the train?
Friggin ridiculous.
Really?! And what happens to the patients in the area from which those assets are allocated? This is not a situation where you can rob Peter to pay Paul. This “logistical†redistribution is exactly what people are talking about when they say the system will be overwhelmed. Pull masks from here, ventilators from there. Doctors from here, nurses from there. And meanwhile little Johnny dies from an infection due to compound fracture in his leg. And trucker Bill dies from burns over 30% of his body from that accident he was in. And grandma dies from an otherwise survivable heart attack.
Oh bullcrap. There are VAST regions of this country that are as yet unaffected by this virus, and more yet where it is under control. If estimates are true, that will not last - two weeks from now, those areas will be taking it in the teeth, just like New York is now (I don't actually buy that, but for the sake of the argument...)
Every one of those areas can spare people and parts right now. They might need to put it all in overdrive to cover the absences, but they CAN do it.
Temporarily easing staffing issues.
Temporarily supplying hard and soft parts, relieving both deficits.
The hat trick is getting em back where they need to be JIT.
But it buys you three to six weeks - and if industry and supply are up and humming, there ain't a damn thing I can't get in three weeks.
And there are likewise benefits to the downstream locations that supplied earlier... Their people come back to them hardened, immune, and can hit the ground running, having standardized effective means and efficiencies, in real-world experience. And not just theirs, but a whole damn army of em, in the nick of time. The same for non-medical support. Whole crews of grips and roadies, used to setting up mash style ICU units, mobile hell-on-wheels supply chains, food systems, showers, crash pads, the whole 9 yards.
Put the damn show on the road and they WILL figure it out. Similar to what we do for forest fire fighters. Whole dang towns just show up all hauled in just in time, highly functional in support as needed, and torn down and disappeared as soon as they are done, moving to the next hotspot.
But no... better, ain't it, to let every one of those locations go through EXACTLY what is happening now, all over again, and again, and again... Everywhere the thing fires up, everybody green, working under theoretical protocols and with limited, fixed resources, sure to be inefficient, sure to be overloaded, with no help coming, and no supply chain because some dumass shut it all down. Yeah, sure... that's the ticket.
That's what castle thinking has already done. It's too late now to swing anything. Precious weeks have gone by, and the pipeline is already empty.
Stupidity at it's finest.
