0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
@Maj. Bill Martin@mystery-ak Martin, you said: "Here's what's going on: you simply are not applying the same level of scrutiny/skepticism to the things Democrats are doing as you apply to Trump. You are accepting their explanations/excuses at face value without any real skepticism or analysis, while doing the exact opposite with anything Trump does. That's why people are calling you out on that apparent bias."You are incorrect. I accept nothing at face value; I study what is going on in politics every single day, my TV stays on constantly on Fox and CNN, and I research everyday. I do that because I worked in Republican politics for over 10 years. I have a framed Certificate of Appreciation from the National Republican Committee for the work I did.My opposition to Trump is ONE REASON - In my professional opinion he has a severe Personality Disorder and should not be president. None of the Democrats running should be President, however I have studied each one's behavior, Biden, Bernie, Warren, from their childhood up just as I did with Trump, and none of them have behavior suggesting a dangerous Personality Disorder as Trump's behavior does every single day.
Ranking Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein Left Senate During Schiff Testimony – Said “Goodnight†and Went Home…https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/01/22/ranking-democrat-senator-dianne-feinstein-left-senate-during-schiff-testimony-said-goodnight-and-went-home/
@Victoria33 And yet, for all the scrutiny you supposedly apply to Democrats...you still didn't address the point about why "six other departments had to sign off" didn't matter when it came to the Clintons and Uranium One.
Someone should make a Motion to dismiss Feinswine from the jury.
@Maj. Bill MartinI wrote the process - I was not there and neither were you, to know what was said and how they came to an agreement about the uranium. Maybe they had orders from Obama to accept the uranium sell - I do not know and neither do you.