The cited Texas law is unconstitutional. You appear to take seriously the notion that your gun rights are defended against encroachment by the Federal Constitution. If that's the case, then why not this couple's right to marry? It's the same old story - rights for me but not for thee.
Let me be clear - I do not dispute the sincerity of this judge's religious beliefs. She is entitled to them, same as you or me. But as an officer of the court, she is obliged to uphold and administer the law, or else resign if she cannot.
First and foremost, my gun rights are defended by not just my gun, but the community of people who own guns who similarly will stand up for those rights with whatever means necessary.
Like I said before, this whole thing reeks of targeting a Christian Judge, like homosexuals have targeted Christian Bakers, Photographers, and others in an effort to coerce Christians to apostasy or unemployment.
It's wrong, an abuse of the Constitution, an effort to codify an anti-religion, and I expect you know that. There are plenty of judges in the country, why target this one?
Now if Congress can make no law (with respect to religion), kindly tell me where the courts, which are NOT empowered to make law, can.
