NYT: ‘Whistleblower’ Redacted Third Fact Suggesting Potential Bias Against Trump

[mystery-ak]

Sean Moran 9 Oct 2019

The New York Times reported that, along with the intelligence officer “whistleblower” being a registered Democrat and having a “professional relationship” with a 2020 Democrat, there remains a third redacted reason critics could accuse him of “potential bias” when submitting his complaint to the Intelligence Community inspector general.

The Washington Examiner’s Byron York reported Tuesday that the intelligence officer “whistleblower” had a “professional relationship” with a 2020 Democrat presidential candidate and was a registered Democrat, which critics could use to accuse the “whistleblower” of bias against President Donald Trump and his administration.

However, the New York Times‘ Nicholas Fandos also reported Tuesday that there remains a third reason that the “whistleblower identified” that could “be used to accuse him of potential bias against Mr. Trump.”

more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/09/nyt-whistleblower-redacted-third-fact-suggesting-potential-bias-against-trump/

[PeteS in CA]

Nicholas Fandos works at the NYT's WashDC bureau covering Congress. This means that the NYT has basically affirmed that the report that the leakblower has or has had a "professional relationship" with a 2020 Democrat presidential candidate is correct.

That the leakblower is a registered D is not a huge deal. That the leakblower has or has had a "professional relationship" with a 2020 Democrat presidential candidate is big enough to render the leakblower's complaint dubious.

So what third evidence of bias is so serious - fatal to the credibility of the complaint? potentially criminal? - that it has been redacted?