What remains to be proven in both general and special relativity?
Observation has confirmed most of those theories, nuclear power plants and weapons validate them by being predictable/controllable enough to engineer them. Do you have the math to be able to understand Einstein's theories? If you do, then you ought to know that you can derive Newton's "laws" (actually theories) from general relativity. Copernicus and Galileo did not formulate any scientific "laws". Johannes Kepler did, and Newton built off that too.
Darwin did not have the math that Einstein did to describe his theory. By slamming him, you revealed to me your scientific ignorance.
------------------------------------
So predictable!
The Darwin and Einstein apologist club rationalize their opinions by disparaging
original minds of the past and then making excuses for the intellectual
shortcomings of these two, because "they didn't have this or that." How terribly sad.
Suggest the apologist fan club consult a proctologist at least semi-annually and
dispense w/the science pretensions. Advice from an engineer!!!