If The FBI Is Investigating These Allegations, They Absolutely Must Investigate Ford's Credibility

[rangerrebew]

If The FBI Is Investigating These Allegations, They Absolutely Must Investigate Ford's Credibility

Questions that must be asked of Ford, and her lawyers, and Democrats -- under oath.

1. Democratic staffers, particularly those of Diane Feinstein, must be asked under oath and under penalty of felony if they leaked Ford's name and/or her letter to friendlies in the media.

2. Ford must be asked, under oath, which therapist notes she gave to the Washington Post. She was asked this yesterday, but suffered one of her notorious memory lapses and said she didn't know and would have to ask her lawyers. Which she then proceeded to not ask them.

3. Obviously, any time she claims she doesn't know and that only her lawyers would know, her lawyers must be asked under oath.

Her lawyers, by the way, cannot invoke lawyer-client privilege regarding notes they gave to a third party. Information given to a third party is not a confidential lawyer-client communication and not shielded by privilege.

http://minx.cc:1080/?post=377326

[catfish1957]

If The FBI Is Investigating These Allegations, They Absolutely Must Investigate Ford's Credibility

Plus dig up every single adverse fact about her since her last dirty diaper.

[Absalom]

If The FBI Is Investigating These Allegations, They Absolutely Must Investigate Ford's Credibility

Questions that must be asked of Ford, and her lawyers, and Democrats -- under oath.

1. Democratic staffers, particularly those of Diane Feinstein, must be asked under oath and under penalty of felony if they leaked Ford's name and/or her letter to friendlies in the media.

2. Ford must be asked, under oath, which therapist notes she gave to the Washington Post. She was asked this yesterday, but suffered one of her notorious memory lapses and said she didn't know and would have to ask her lawyers. Which she then proceeded to not ask them.

3. Obviously, any time she claims she doesn't know and that only her lawyers would know, her lawyers must be asked under oath.

Her lawyers, by the way, cannot invoke lawyer-client privilege regarding notes they gave to a third party. Information given to a third party is not a confidential lawyer-client communication and not shielded by privilege.

http://minx.cc:1080/?post=377326

-------------------------
A strategy too stupid for words as it
archives the core Left objective of,
MORE DELAY!!!

[LadyLiberty]

Please, no additions to the scope of this probe so that it can be completed ASAP.  This is more than worthy of investigation, but make it separate.

I suspect that in that jumbled up head of hers she has pulled together actual memories of visiting Garrets house when they were dating (and maybe even did something consentual) and morphed it into a sexual assault by someone she has never met.

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

What credibility?