When I scan this list, none of these meet what the poster said are 'direct monetary supports the governments at any level gives the oil/gas companies'.
Your reference is a document that is a global world-order spreading nonsense in environmental policies particularly under the UN. As such, it cannot be trusted.
I believe the poster was referring to loans or grants given oil/gas companies similar to the billions given to subsidiize solar, ethanol, wind, etc.
Do you have a comparable document detailing those? Here's what I found
Most current federal subsidies support developing renewable energy supplies (primarily biofuels, wind, and solar) and reducing energy consumption through energy efficiency. In FY 2016, nearly half (45%) of federal energy subsidies were associated with renewable energy, and 42% were associated with energy end uses. Table 4 shows a more detailed distribution of renewable energy-related federal support.
https://www.eia.gov/analysis/requests/subsidy/pdf/subsidy.pdf
Using a bit of Al Gore math, eh?
Tax credits and other subsidies are subsidies, regardless of how you or Algore want to do accounting.
The poster to whom I was responding,
@Joe Wooten, asked: "What are the "fossil fuel subsidies" these papers speak of?" and I provided a source discussing that.
As to his statement, "I do not know of any direct monetary supports the governments at any level gives the oil/gas companies," your source lays those out in Table 3. Back in 2013, nearly half a billion dollars was given out in
direct subsidies between coal, natural gas, and petroleum. It has dropped to $130 million for 2016, and is dwarfed by what renewables used to get and the $909 million of 2016, but that wasn't the question asked.
