This is just insane. Poster after poster is engaged in masturbatory fantasies about shooting the "gun grabbers". No one is willing to rely on the Constitution and the rule of law, it's just head for the bunker and get ready to rumble or die trying.
What I've proposed is simple licensure and registration. Not confiscation of "assault rifles". If there are bills out there that promise the latter, I join with you in urging their unconstitutionality. But for cryin' out loud, let the system work. The Heller decision showed that the system works. I urge the codification of that decision, but even if that offends you, at least let this great Republic and its institutions protect you from tyranny as they were designed to do. We are a nation of laws, not men.
The Heller decision only showed that the level of Constitutional compliance has sunken to a new low, that the right to defend one's self and to own and carry arms for that purpose needed to be judicially affirmed.
What you have proposed (registration) is the historically consistent precursor to confiscation. It is the first step to the wholesale collection of the people's arms. I and others have provided examples from here in the US, to Australia, and others, not to mention the Weimar Republic and East Bloc, and in each case, the result has been the same: those records were used to confiscate registered arms.
Even the Canadian gun owners resisted long gun registration by noncompliance (not violence), as we have said we will also do. Somehow, in your distorted, bodily fluid soaked liberal fantasies, you have not only ignored historical precedent but continue to promote an infringement of the right and project your sexual level of excitement over the topic upon others. (Ick.Nasty image.)
We are indeed a nation of laws, but men make those laws and claim of late to interpret plain language to mean something it clearly does not. When men pull a right from a warm dark orifice and wave it as if they 'found' it in the Constitution, they have departed from their sworn task. That "right" does not pass the smell test.
The Right of the People to keep and bear Arms is not only far more clear than you would admit, but only the enforced ignorance of the American public via government approved education schemes would even allow any interpretation other than that which the Founders intended.
That somehow, in the phrases and paragraphs of the Constitution or the supporting documentation that any Right to shred the developing baby in the mother's womb could be found completely relies on ignorance of the documents, the Founders, the language, and original intent.
The Law, the concept, of the RKBA is not flawed, but the alleged interpretation sure is in many popular instances.
Ruling on the Constitutionality of such laws as would further infringe upon the Right, if done with a flawed interpretation of the original premise, will yield flawed rulings in many cases (Miller was a fine example, which ignored, even with the Militia interpretation of the 2nd, the martial utility of short barrelled shotguns in WWI .
As for laws, those laws only exist, along with any authority given them, by the consent of the people: the governed. If they are imposed against the will of the people, then they will be resisted, especially if they go against the documents argued to be the Supreme Law of the Land, second only to God's law, and His judgement.
While we have said that we will respond to violence in kind, who would not? None here, not even yourself, has debated the right to defend one's self, home, and family against marauders. Who would meekly surrender their lives, their property, their material safety to those who have come to loot it, even under color of law? Not happening, peaches.
While possible, we will quietly and nonviolently resist. Noncompliance is the first tool, the one which preserves the tools which may be needed for more serious resistance, something the Founders fully intended.
As for violent resistance to the confiscation of arms goes, the precedent has been established, whether at Lexington, or Bull Run, or on Pratt Street, the people will resist. It's the American way.
