The ruling is insane.
It basically says that Trump (who uses EO in the narrow, more correct way, as defined, than Obama did), can't call DACA "illegal", like he did in his tweets, because the courts have not deterrmined "yet" whether DACA is legal or not.
So, Obama's unconstitutional over-reach of DACA is law until the courts decide otherwise, because the Chief Executive (Trump) cannot determine the legality, but merely enforce, unless told otherwise be the court.
In other words, Obama can make un-enforcement of immigration "law" through DACA by EO, but Trump cannot change it until the court says Obama's EO was unlawful.
They are using the very thing that Obama has done to say Trump cannot do the same.
No logic.
And yes, the tweets were mentioned in the ruling.
I disagree wholeheartedly with the ruling, but the tweets were mentioned.
Mentioned with the dates of the tweets, as well.