So Breitbart ina an effort to save face backpedals "in retrospect". whoop dee doo. They bvlow with the wind over there and they are more concerned with toadying up to Trump than the truth, and have been for a while. As we have seen, even on this site among those who took obviously flawed accusations using forged documents and even when confronted with the problems with those chose to run whole hog against the man. I seriously suspect the reason has to do with his position on marriage being only between a man and a woman.
It is obvious the homosexuals were out in force because of his homosexual son, and dead set against Moore who had stood up for the Amendment to the Alabama Constitution which specified marriage was only between one man and one woman to the point he lost his job over it. The homolobby, which includes significant media influence was out to get Moore, and you marched with them. Be proud, along with the rest of that parade.
For your troubles you got an anti marriage (in the thousands of years old sense, not faggotry masquerading as Holy Matrimony), a die hard abortion supporter, and a Democrat. By their fruits shall ye know them.
Your strong implication here is that everyone who opposed Moore is pro-homosexual, influenced by the media and not conservative.
That is factually, and
morally wrong, and the more you use that bogus argument against those who opposed Moore, the less honest you appear.
One of the things I have always admired about you,
@Smokin Joe , is your strong adherence to moral law and righteousness, which I believe is completely genuine.
However, in your sometimes unthinking loyalty to Moore and your broad brushed attacks on those of us who found him a bad candidate and unworthy idol, you are at risk of losing your moral authority on this forum (at least for me).
Please rethink where your loyalty to a
politician is taking you, and the false accusations you are making against those of us who are unflinchingly moral, yet unwilling to support Roy Moore because of his deep flaws..