Are there different version of the WAPO story? The one I read (which is link at the top of this thread), said:
Trump went on to discuss aspects of the threat that the United States learned only through the espionage capabilities of a key partner. He did not reveal the specific intelligence-gathering method, but he described how the Islamic State was pursuing elements of a specific plot and how much harm such an attack could cause under varying circumstances. Most alarmingly, officials said, Trump revealed the city in the Islamic State’s territory where the U.S. intelligence partner detected the threat.
Go to the beginning of this thread. It is close enough in implication to what I said, and this implication has of course been echoed endlessly in the rest of the Liberal Stream Media.
Without their implied claim of compromising intelligence assets, this is a big nothing. This is a non-story.
Without that specific part, this story is dead. It's not pinin'! 'It's passed on! This story is no more! It has ceased to be! 'It's expired and gone to meet 'its maker!
'It's a stiff! Bereft of life, 'It rests in peace! If the Media hadn't nailed 'it to the perch 'it'd be pushing up the daisies!
'Its metabolic processes are now 'istory! 'It's off the twig!
'It's kicked the bucket, 'It's shuffled off 'its mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisibile!!
THIS IS AN EX-STORY!!
i.e. #FakeNews.
