Ok,since you didn't participate you have no grounds to complain. Not making a decisions is a punk move when you know for a fact that ONE of the two candidates is going to win.
First, if I didn't want to participate, I would have stayed home and not voted.
Second, it's not a punk move when you know for a fact that none of the candidates is to your taste or to what you think is
good for the country.
If it weren't Trump,it would be even worse because it would be a dedicated anti-American communist and professional criminal and traitor sitting in the WH instead of a 70 year old narcissist going on 14.
Unfortunately, it
is Donaldus Minimus now. The "whatabout-ism" no longer applies. Be grateful we dodged a Hilarious bullet
but lament that there was nothing better to oppose her. And pray.
Yeah,it would have been soooo much "prettier" with the Hilderbeast and Bubba back in the WH,selling nuke secrets to China again,having people murdered that caused them trouble,etc,etc,etc. Since you seem to be such a big fan of Bubbette!,why didn't you have the courage of your convictions and vote for her?
I have
never been a fan of Hilarious Rodent Clinton. I am
well on record in opposition to her. I didn't vote "None of These
Candidates" to put one of them in the White House, I voted "None of These Candidates" because my convictions told me to vote for
neither of them. (Or anyone else on the presidential ballot; not even the Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson, and what the
hell was that party thinking nominating what was, when all was said and done, a Rockefeller Republican type?) The only votes that
counted toward either one of them were the votes that were cast explicitly for either one of them.