We already know his stances on the things you mention. They are well documented and unlikely to change.
Trump wasn't the most conservative candidate that could have won. Only a Trump "true believer" or a foll thinks otherwise. And BTW I'm not talking about you in either category in this conversation.
There is no principle and there is no principled conservatism is what Trump is...what he stands for or what his policies will be.
Brilliant Conservatives...are these the ones he's vetting through BHO or ones we haven't seen him nominate yet?
At the end of the day...America got the President it deserved...NOT the one it needed.
Come on, brother! Trump was clearly the most conservative candidate in the GENERAL ELECTION who could win. I didn't support DJT in the primaries (Cruz was my choice). I cannot easily believe that a man of your obviously above-average intellect did not know what I meant.
Much of the rest of your statement is stipulated but some of it is speculative. I accept the former only.
Mark Levin has endorsed some of Trump's picks for cabinet posts as reliably conservative and with all due respect (and that is great) I trust the Great One's appraisal more than most of the posters on this forum, myself inclusive. Concerning the concerns of character deficiency and lack of ideological integrity, in my own experience, speculation is only generally useful in oil-drilling, investment banking and theoretical physics.
What may be has not happened yet and has therefore contains little substance in discussions of what is, not what might be.