Can't Make It Up: 12 Clinton Staffers Took 12 Hours and 10 Drafts to Compose One Tweet

[mystery-ak]

By:
Chase Stephens
October 29, 2016


MSNBC's Chuck Todd noticed something interesting in the latest batch of leaked Clinton campaign emails and finally shed some light on the age-old question, "How many liberals does it take to write one pandering tweet for their corrupt career political candidate?" Answer: 12.

That's right, in an email chain exposed by WikiLeaks, 12 Clinton staffers over the course of 12 hours went through 10 different drafts before finalizing one single 134-character ghostwritten tweet for Crooked Hillary about raising the minimum wage. 

Worth noting that Clinton's campaign maintains that an "H" means that the tweet was sent by Hillary herself. It may be time to change the signoff to "H+12."

Drafts included:

more
http://www.dailywire.com/news/10333/cant-make-it-12-clinton-staffers-took-12-hours-and-chase-stephens?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=benshapiro#

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

One thing about Trump, he's the only one dumb enough to write those tweets.

[Victoria33]

@mystery-ak

Words mean things - if I were running, I would want time taken to do what they did rather than putting out a tweet with words that would harm the campaign.  Evidently, no one has control over what Trump tweets (plus no one has control over what comes out of his mouth).  He is the poster child for unregulated tweets. 

[Axel]

@mystery-ak

Words mean things - if I were running, I would want time taken to do what they did rather than putting out a tweet with words that would harm the campaign.  Evidently, no one has control over what Trump tweets (plus no one has control over what comes out of his mouth).  He is the poster child for unregulated tweets.

Hillary shill. Stop deflecting criticism of Hillary's robotic campaign. No one cares what you would do if you were running for President. If you want to disparage Trump incessantly there are plenty of liberal websites out there for you. The OP has nothing to do with Trump.

[sneakypete]

By:
Chase Stephens
October 29, 2016


MSNBC's Chuck Todd noticed something interesting in the latest batch of leaked Clinton campaign emails and finally shed some light on the age-old question, "How many liberals does it take to write one pandering tweet for their corrupt career political candidate?" Answer: 12.

That's right, in an email chain exposed by WikiLeaks, 12 Clinton staffers over the course of 12 hours went through 10 different drafts before finalizing one single 134-character ghostwritten tweet for Crooked Hillary about raising the minimum wage. 

Worth noting that Clinton's campaign maintains that an "H" means that the tweet was sent by Hillary herself. It may be time to change the signoff to "H+12."

Drafts included:

more
http://www.dailywire.com/news/10333/cant-make-it-12-clinton-staffers-took-12-hours-and-chase-stephens?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=benshapiro#

@mystery-ak

You would think that a woman who ran for president as "the smartest woman in the world" would have been able to come up with something on her own,wouldn't you?

Never mind after spending more than 4 decades in politics working in offices be able to figure out how to send a fax or get a printer to print.

[sneakypete]

Hillary shill. Stop deflecting criticism of Hillary's robotic campaign. No one cares what you would do if you were running for President. If you want to disparage Trump incessantly there are plenty of liberal websites out there for you. The OP has nothing to do with Trump.

@Axel

Uhhhh,not only is she one of the site owners,but she has been in the bag for Trump since the day he announced.

This would be a good time to apologize.

[Oceander]

Hillary shill. Stop deflecting criticism of Hillary's robotic campaign. No one cares what you would do if you were running for President. If you want to disparage Trump incessantly there are plenty of liberal websites out there for you. The OP has nothing to do with Trump.

@Axel
The only Hillary shills here are the bleep - people like you - whose sole goal appears to be getting Clinton elected, since they nominated the one person who cannot beat her, not even now.

[Axel]

@Axel

Uhhhh,not only is she one of the site owners,but she has been in the bag for Trump since the day he announced.

This would be a good time to apologize.

@sneakypete

Re-read my post. I was responding to Victoria, who has said she supports Clinton.

[Axel]

@Axel
The only Hillary shills here are the bleep - people like you - whose sole goal appears to be getting Clinton elected, since they nominated the one person who cannot beat her, not even now.

I have done nothing to help Hillary. You are so out of touch. You lost the nomination - get over it. We're not going away, and we're not going to nominate another RINO.

You've been watching Hillary Clinton campaign ads way too much.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrX3Ql31URA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHGPbl-werw

Funny, your signature quote is basically advocating the theme of Hillary attack ads. You too are shilling for Hillary, eating up their campaign message and spewing it all over this website.