Author Topic: California: Supreme Court Set to Slash Public Pension Benefits  (Read 1438 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,762
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
California: Supreme Court Set to Slash Public Pension Benefits
« on: October 21, 2016, 05:45:36 pm »
For decades, California courts have prevented any cuts to luxurious public employee pensions, but the California Supreme Court is now reviewing arguments in a case that could allow slashing benefits.

A three-judge California Appellate Court ruling in August declared that public employee retirement plans were not “immutable,” because employees only required a “reasonable” pension. The ruling was a shock to unions that have been able to sustain public pension spikes, even if they put cities like San Bernardino in bankruptcy.

The appeal now before the California Supreme Court could have an impact that reverberates across the nation. Prior court rulings created what is referred to as the “California Rule,” which guaranteed government workers the pension that was in place on the day they were first hired.

As a result, this “first-in, always-in” precedent legally perpetuated a California government system that is wildly insolvent to the tune of $484.2 billion. That works out to a stunning debt of about $77,700 for every household in the state, according to the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research “U.S. Pension Tracker.”...

Read more at: http://www.breitbart.com/california/2016/10/21/pension-california-supreme-court-may-allow-slashing/
The Republic is lost.

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,173
Re: California: Supreme Court Set to Slash Public Pension Benefits
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2016, 08:36:53 pm »
For decades, California courts have prevented any cuts to luxurious public employee pensions, but the California Supreme Court is now reviewing arguments in a case that could allow slashing benefits.

A three-judge California Appellate Court ruling in August declared that public employee retirement plans were not “immutable,” because employees only required a “reasonable” pension. The ruling was a shock to unions that have been able to sustain public pension spikes, even if they put cities like San Bernardino in bankruptcy.

The appeal now before the California Supreme Court could have an impact that reverberates across the nation. Prior court rulings created what is referred to as the “California Rule,” which guaranteed government workers the pension that was in place on the day they were first hired.

As a result, this “first-in, always-in” precedent legally perpetuated a California government system that is wildly insolvent to the tune of $484.2 billion. That works out to a stunning debt of about $77,700 for every household in the state, according to the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research “U.S. Pension Tracker.”...

Read more at: http://www.breitbart.com/california/2016/10/21/pension-california-supreme-court-may-allow-slashing/


It's basically rule by Judge at this point.

Offline skeeter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,717
  • Gender: Male
Re: California: Supreme Court Set to Slash Public Pension Benefits
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2016, 08:41:25 pm »

It's basically rule by Judge at this point.

As long as the State likes the rule.

If the State doesn't approve that judge will likely be looking at early retirement.

Corrupt to the core.


Offline Machiavelli

  • Curmudgeon
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,222
  • Gender: Male
  • Realist
Re: California: Supreme Court Set to Slash Public Pension Benefits
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2016, 09:49:40 pm »


California Ping

Please click here to be added to or removed from the California Ping List.  ^-^

If you post an article here, please send me a mention: @Machiavelli

@American Patriot @bootless @flowers @Ginger Republic @GtHawk

@Half Vast Conspiracy @Machiavelli @Meshuge Mikey @Mr McBeevee @pogo101

@skeeter @SZonian @The Jackal @To-Whose-Benefit? @truth_seeker