I stand corrected for using the wrong word in my post.
As I understood it you were attempting to use the statisics to prove they are racist.
Referring to the statistics you stated:
Are you contending they are racist in regards to their clients and not memebers? Perhaps you can elaborate how the statics showed them to be open to claims of discrimination and possibly legal action.
I thought I proved that clearly in the earlier post to which you responded. At least it seemed quite clear to me.
Whites make up either 62%-74% of the population, depending on how you want to define it.
12% of the people helped by the "La Raza Lawyers association" were Black, and this very closely corresponds to the percentage of the population that is black.
20% of the people helped by the "la Raza lawyers association" were White, and this very greatly deviates from the percentage of the population they represent. (62%-74%)
68% of the people they have helped were Hispanic, but they only constitute 17.4% of the population.
If they were being strictly neutral regarding race, 17.4% of those people being helped would be Hispanic, and 62-74% of them would be white.
At least that is how the numbers have always come down from various courts regarding cases where white people have been accused of discrimination.
In an effort to make the point clearer, If the "La Raza Laywers association" was "Anglo-Saxon Lawyers association", they would be immediately accused of discrimination and sued because their clients do not correctly represent a corresponding cross section of the overall population.
When white people have been sued, the courts have generally applied a quota system relating to the percentages of the population that are made up of the various groups.
I remember one such instance years ago regarding a Lamp manufacture, which I think was in Illinois. (I believe I saw this case on 60 minutes years ago.) His factory was in an area where it had a larger Hispanic population and had very few blacks, but he was hauled into court by the Federal government because he didn't have enough black people working for him.
He claimed that he tried to hire blacks, but there just wasn't very many of them in the surrounding area, so he received very few black applications.
He lost.