(POLL #2) VOTE! IF TRUMP IS THE NOMINEE WILL YOU VOTE FOR HIM?

[flowers]

Flowers, proof of what?  I expressed an opinion and asked Lert to correct me if was wrong.  Looks like he confirmed what I said.

You used the wrong attack method on this one.

What? How was that a attack on you? @Sanguine

[flowers]

@Sanguine please let me know how that question was a attack on you. I really want to know.

[Sanguine]

@Sanguine please let me know how that question was a attack on you. I really want to know.

Remember what I posted: 

I think Lert came from FR; he can correct me if wrong.

And, he got called on his spamming and agreed to quit.

Lert promptly confirmed my statements.

So, why did I take it as an attack?

Because instead of just taking my opinion for what it was, you asked me for links to "prove" my opinion.  I try to make sure all of my opinions are backed by facts, so I actually knew what I was talking about before I posted it.

And, because A+Bert's identity or origin is not a secret.  There were prior posts by other people.  And, you don't miss much.

If you were asking because you were genuinely curious as to Lert's information and had missed all of the prior comments and merely wanted to read more about him, I stand corrected.  But, provide proof, please.   

[flowers]

If you were asking because you were genuinely curious as to Lert's information and had missed all of the prior comments and merely wanted to read more about him, I stand corrected.  But, provide proof, please.   

That is the only reason I asked you and A-Lert about it. How can I provide proof on me genuinely wanting to know about that?  If Thank you for responding to my ping. @Sanguine

[Sanguine]

That is the only reason I asked you and A-Lert about it. How can I provide proof on me genuinely wanting to know about that?  If Thank you for responding to my ping. @Sanguine

Exactly!  It's hard to present proof of something like that.

OK, Flowers, I can accept that.  It just came across wrong. 

(And, I shouldn't let agitators pull my chain!)

[flowers]

Exactly!  It's hard to present proof of something like that.

OK, Flowers, I can accept that.  It just came across wrong. 

(And, I shouldn't let agitators pull my chain!)

[Oceander]

For the record, I will not vote for Trump.

[A-Lert]

I believe Sanguine said he/she put me on ignore. I've never understood why, if you put someone on ignore, you continue posting about him/her. It seems sleazy to me.

[Free Vulcan]

Answer is still no.

[Bill Cipher]

Still #NeverTrump


Good luck with that general election.  Better start stocking up on KY for Jan. 20th, when y'all will have to pledge allegiance to president Clinton or President Sanders. 

In a way, since it has to be one of those two, better Sanders because it should be marginally easier to contain and repair the inevitable damage. 

[catfish1957]

For the record, I will not vote for Trump.

Yep, let the 3rd Party vetting begin!!!!!!!

[wolfcreek]

I posted this elsewhere so, if it seems like I'm repeating myself.....

 So the alternative is to continue using the juvenile Michelle Obama hashtags? It's time for people on the Right to put aside their differences, their vanity and whatever else is holding them back and unite to defeat that Commie BITCH.

If she ends up winning because any of you decided to sit on their thumbs this fall, I don't want to hear a word of complaining about the direction of the country.

[wolfcreek]

By the same logic, if you vote for Trump, you have no right to complain about anything he does because you helped elect him, right?

I have a question.  Did you vote for George Bush?  If so, then -according to your logic - you had no right to object to or complain about No Child Left Behind, Medicare Part D, the "ownership society" pushing home ownership on people who couldn't afford it, etc. etc.

In sum, it is not our fault that the only two choices on the ballot are Trump and Hillary, both of whom are very likely to do things in office with which we strongly disagree.

Wrong. I will hold whoever wins to the highest standards. Hillary doesn't have any standards.

The next POTUS will likely appoint up to four new Justices. You want Hillary making those choices?

[Bigun]

#never trump!

NO way in hell!

[Oceander]

I posted this elsewhere so, if it seems like I'm repeating myself.....

 So the alternative is to continue using the juvenile Michelle Obama hashtags? It's time for people on the Right to put aside their differences, their vanity and whatever else is holding them back and unite to defeat that Commie BITCH.

If she ends up winning because any of you decided to sit on their thumbs this fall, I don't want to hear a word of complaining about the direction of the country.

Sorry, but the only thing I'm responsible for is my individual vote.  Collective guilt is a liberal thing and you should be ashamed for using that liberal tactic.

If Trump loses because he doesn't get enough votes, the blame lies solely with those who nominated him.  They were warned well in advance that he was unelectable and they chose the nominate him anyway.  That is their fault, not mine. 

[Oceander]

By the same logic, if you vote for Trump, you have no right to complain about anything he does because you helped elect him, right?

I have a question.  Did you vote for George Bush?  If so, then -according to your logic - you had no right to object to or complain about No Child Left Behind, Medicare Part D, the "ownership society" pushing home ownership on people who couldn't afford it, etc. etc.

In sum, it is not our fault that the only two choices on the ballot are Trump and Hillary, both of whom are very likely to do things in office with which we strongly disagree.

True.  And none of them has the right to complain about Chief Justice Roberts and his distinct need to get consensus even if it means going left of center. 

[Sanguine]

I posted this elsewhere so, if it seems like I'm repeating myself.....

 So the alternative is to continue using the juvenile Michelle Obama hashtags? It's time for people on the Right to put aside their differences, their vanity and whatever else is holding them back and unite to defeat that Commie BITCH.

If she ends up winning because any of you decided to sit on their thumbs this fall, I don't want to hear a word of complaining about the direction of the country.

Wrong.  The trump selection pretty much guarantees a hillary election.  We should have united and selected a good candidate.

[Sanguine]

Wrong. I will hold whoever wins to the highest standards. Hillary doesn't have any standards.

The next POTUS will likely appoint up to four new Justices. You want Hillary making those choices?

You will "hold whoever wins to the highest standards"?  Exactly how are you planning on doing that?

[sneakypete]

THIS IS THE 2ND OF TWO POLLS.

AGAIN, AS IN THE LAST ONE, ONLY ONE VOTE FOR MEMBER.

THESE ARE MEMBER ONLY POLLS.

WE MAY OPEN THEM TO GUESTS IN A WEEK.

YOU MAY DISCUSS THIS POLL ON THIS THREAD, AS LONG AS IT STAYS CIVIL

I can't find a button to pick so my vote would be counted,but MY answer is "NO,NO,NO,A THOUSAND TIMES NO!"

[sneakypete]

I would hope convention delegates do not put me in this position to vote against my conservative principles.

Why? Where is the conflict?  You either have principles,or you don't.

[sneakypete]

What I'm curious about is, who will vote for Hillary.

She has a solid lock on the Whymen? vote,the black vote,the NAMBLA vote,the transgender vote,and the Muslim vote.

I am temped to say she also has a solid lock on the prisoner vote,but they are already represented in each of the categories above.

[sneakypete]

I would vote for anyone to keep Clinton from the White House.

You have already proved your desperation by supporting the NYC Dim with orange hair.

[sneakypete]

In the first election in my 40 years of voting, I would write-in a name.  Trump is not only a Liberal - but he is also dangerous.

I couldn't agree more,but I still think he is planning on dropping out late in the election,leaving the alleged Republicans scrambling for a candidate with only a month or so left in the campaign. This guarantees Hillary a win,and it keeps him from being a "loser". After all,you are not a "loser" if you voluntarily drop out because you have been mistreated and lied to,right?

And once again for those who may have missed my earlier posts on this subject,"He will then spend the rest of his life bragging about how "I COULD have been the president of the US,but I decided I had been mistreated and the job was beneath me,so I dropped out."

Just imagine what he estimates the value of his "trademark" (the Trump name) is now that he is the presumed Republican Candidate for President! He rated it as being worth $ BILLION when he was nobody but the "Bankruptcy King of Queens".

[sneakypete]

If Sanders is the dim candidate it means Hillary is gone. Hopefully being charged, convicted and imprisoned.

Or maybe Santa and the Easter Bunny took her to Candyland for tea?

[sneakypete]

I changed my vote to support Trump if he's the nominee. Frankly I'm tired of the whole Cruz vs. Trump thing.

I still support Cruz over Trump but the level of vitriol aimed at members of the same side is self-destructive IMO.

That being said, Cruz is still the best candidate and I hope he wins in June. But if he doesn't I'll go with Trump.

Thanks! I always find it helpful when people self-describe themselves as a part of the problem.