If you don't understand what I'm saying I will make you aware of that. It doesn't mean I'm calling you stupid. I have never once called a member of this community stupid and I never will.
You completely misunderstood what I was saying about the emotions you mentioned. The fact that those emotions exist doesn't mean polygamy is unnatural. Not everybody gets angry and jealous for the same reasons you might. Polygamy works for some people.
Not all of them.
Can you prove that all women don't do well with polygamy? Can you prove they all get jealous and angry?
I don't watch TV.
First of all, I want to know why I'm the only poster whose comments you separate bit by bit, making it much harder to respond to.
Just curious. Now to try to respond....
Your implication to everyone who doesn't agree with you is to say, "You'd agree if you just understood what I was saying. You just don't get it." That response implies that if the people responding were a bit brighter, they'd understand you. You may not use the word 'stupid,' but this is a serial technique you use to put other posters down.
And, no, I didn't misunderstand what you were saying about emotions.
Your argument that because a few people can deal with polygamy (though I doubt many do in reality), it is "natural" is a spurious argument. One can find exceptions to almost any law of human nature, but it doesn't prove that the law doesn't exist.
Polygamy isn't 'natural' for women because of the very nature of women. I don't need to "prove" that ALL women respond badly to it. Again, a spurious argument.
SOME women don't admit that they're battered by their husbands, and claim they're happy with the man who's beating them. Do you think, therefore, that it is "natural" for women to be abused by their husband? It is most likely that any woman claiming to be happy in a polygamous marriage does so because of low self-esteem (you know about that, right??).
She doesn't think she deserves better............. just like many battered women don't think they do.
Your argument fails, Dexter.