Absolutely irrelevant to the discussion, as is any conclusion you draw from my calling out your diversionary tactic.
It is NOT irrelevant. It is entirely relevant to ask a person about their life experiences, particularly when they would impose legal restrictions upon the freedoms of others.
You are setting yourself up as qualified to discern that the benefits of alcohol justify legal use, even though the costs are immense. You cite a "glass of wine" with dinner, or a "beer while watching sports," etc.
Well plenty of pot users would cite a joint, while listening to music in their own homes.
But the reality is thousands of people drink themselves to death every year, and along the way kill others.
By comparison, marijuana is much less dangerous for the user, and the society at large. But the cultural baloney has abounded ever since the ridiculous film "Reefer Madness."
So either admit it is something you have personal knowledge of by usage, or professional experience, or admit it is a cultural thing. Alcohol users are okay, but pot users are not okay. And you want a government to enforce that schism.