Author Topic: Why Taxing Wind And Solar Isn’t Insane And Deserves A Broader Debate  (Read 55 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 179,380
Why Taxing Wind And Solar Isn’t Insane And Deserves A Broader Debate
Americans have been misled by media, politicians, and foreign lobbying into believing renewables are unquestionably good.
by John F. Di Leo  July 03, 2025, 11:11 AM

As usual, the mainstream media is losing its collective mind over the idea of taxing solar and wind power, due to a provision included in the thousand pages of the Big, Beautiful Bill. [emphasis, links added]


The important thing here is that the pundits whining about it clearly don’t understand what energy means in the context of public policy. We must begin by remembering that “energy” can mean many things, depending on the issue at hand.

If you ask an electrical engineer what “energy” is, he may specifically describe the voltage itself and how it travels, but not go further. But in a public policy discussion like this, the voltage is only a tiny slice of a much bigger pie.

https://climatechangedispatch.com/wind-solar-tax-congress-debate/
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 62,217
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
In our state, oil and gas are taxed at 11.5% (even flared gas is taxed) as an extraction tax. Frankly, that funds half of the State Budget, and part is set aside in the Legacy Fund for the future. No, we don't operate at a deficit.

However wind (roughly 1/3 of the electricity generated here, and we generate roughly twice what we use and sell the surplus to Canada, Minnesota, Montana, and South Dakota) is a little different. Hmmm. Valuable agricultural land is used by the industry, and since statehood, agriculture has been the breadwinner (no pun intended).

Oil and Gas companies are required to construct their drilling/production locations in such a way as to ensure environmental safguards, but also have to post a reclamation bond to cover costs of plugging and abandoning a well (or wells, in the case of a multiwell pad) and the reclamation of the surface location.

It turns out here, the same requirements, including a reclamation bond are placed on wind energy facilities, though the foundations need only be removed to a depth of four feet below the surface. (Some far future geologist/paleontologist is going to have fun with that).
Is there an energy production tax?

Well, yes. According to Google AI:

Quote
The Wind Generation Tax (WGT) applies to wind turbines completed after December 31, 2014, or those operating for over 20 years. This tax replaces property taxes and consists of two parts: $2.50 per kilowatt of nameplate capacity and $.0005 per kilowatt-hour generated.

So yes, Virginia, there is a tax, and anywhere that does not gain revenue and have similar protections in place is, well, dumb.
« Last Edit: Today at 03:03:44 am by Smokin Joe »
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis