Author Topic: A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists  (Read 293 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 176,970
A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
« on: December 02, 2024, 07:35:28 am »
A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
 
earth burning up“What physical evidence supports the contention that carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels are the principal cause of global warming since 1970?”

(Remember back in the 1970s, climate scientists and media were predicting a return to an “ice age.”)

I have posed that question to five “climate scientist” professors at the University of Arizona who claim that our carbon dioxide emissions are the principal cause of dangerous global warming.

Yet, when asked the question, none could cite any supporting physical evidence.

https://climatechangedispatch.com/simple-question-for-climate-alarmists/
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Offline DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,274
  • Gender: Male
Re: A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2024, 09:01:41 am »
In the 1970's, the Climate hysteria was about the Antarctic hole in the ozone layer, allegedly caused by CFL's.  Aquanet was public enemy #1.



There was also Acid Rain; briefly Yellow Rain; and the Threat of Nuclear Winter.  Good times.

Is it me, or has Global Climate Change gotten worse since the creation of the US Environmental Protection Agency?

"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,110
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Re: A Simple Question For Climate Alarmists
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2024, 04:30:51 am »
In the 1970's, the Climate hysteria was about the Antarctic hole in the ozone layer, allegedly caused by CFL's.  Aquanet was public enemy #1.



There was also Acid Rain; briefly Yellow Rain; and the Threat of Nuclear Winter.  Good times.

Is it me, or has Global Climate Change gotten worse since the creation of the US Environmental Protection Agency?
When the EPA ran out of real pollution, it had to justify its continued existence. With the smog domes mostly gone, (recall most of the emissions controls on vehicles started in the 70s) it had to go looking elsewhere. Particulates, ever tightening standards for lead and whatever else it could think of worked for a while, but dammit, people found ways to comply with the moving target standards, or shipped their foundries and factories off to some place that only spoke a little English near the airport and hotel.
With all that gone, they siezed on the Anthropognic Global Warming shtick, later renamed "Climate Change", which covered all bases, but still blamed humans for the weather and decided an essential gas for photosynthesis and even respiration was to blame. In an effort to regulate the unregulatable, Morris Strong, Albert Gore, and IIRC George Soros were going to get the country to regulate how much carbon (dioxide) could be produced by industry and sell indulgences purchased from people who had lots of green stuff that soaked up CO2 and make trillions. But no one went for it but the farmers who cashed the checks and kept doing what they were doing while the Midwest Carbon Exchange died for lack of a mandate.

In what may be a fit of pique, they have advocated for "renewable" energy (although all the stuff to harvest it breaks or wears out), possibly making bank on the side from nonsensical artificially imposed limits on how energy is produced and used.
We are here. Huge money is being tossed about on unproven systems to generate gigawatts we have no way of distributing to run vehicles few actually want, and that whole scheme is being propped up by massive grants of our tax dollars disguised as 'loans' and 'incentives' for already well-to-do folks living in areas that are warm, who are the easiest to scare about hotter weather.
It is the most incredible ongoing scam, ever.
Piltdown Man did not last an eyeblink compared to this one, nor generate a scintilla of the revenue.
Typical of cancel culture, the Petition Project which has over 30,000 scientist signatories who asked that we not subscribe to the Kyoto Protocols because human contributions to climate change had not been proven, has been scrubbed from the web.
Far more noteworthy scientists than I were included in the list of signatories, (Linus Pauling, for one), yet Snopes (the couple in their basement with no formal scientific education I know of) said we were unqualified.

I know how difficult it was to prove your CV to be considered qualified, and I was, so in my not so scientific opinion, Snopes can go impale itself, tonsils first on a big one.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis