Author Topic: Judge Rules California's Assault Weapons Act Is Unconstitutional  (Read 2144 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 184,670
Judge Rules California's Assault Weapons Act Is Unconstitutional
Story by Daniel Walker • 15h
 
This article was originally published on our sister site StateOfUnion.org and has been republished with permission.

A recent ruling by U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez in the case of Miller v. Bonta, has found California's Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989 to be a violation of the Second Amendment and therefore unconstitutional.

 
The decision has been praised by pro-second amendment groups but opposed by California State Attorney General Rob Bonta and Governor Gavin Newsom.
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/judge-rules-california-s-assault-weapons-act-is-unconstitutional/ss-BB1mWrci?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=b5f13b4980524f6ea2e42ca5bbe2eb4e&ei=27
abolitionist Frederick Douglass: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will.”

Online Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,669
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
Re: Judge Rules California's Assault Weapons Act Is Unconstitutional
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2024, 10:25:32 am »
Whoa.
The Republic is lost.

Online Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 64,349
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Online Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,669
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
Re: Judge Rules California's Assault Weapons Act Is Unconstitutional
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2024, 10:34:26 am »
Well, about time!

Yes it is, and definitely didn't see that coming.
The Republic is lost.

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,666
Re: Judge Rules California's Assault Weapons Act Is Unconstitutional
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2024, 01:23:23 pm »
I hope Judge Benitez has good body guards. He's become quite a thorn in hoplophobes' collective side.
I am not and never have been a leftist.

If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

US Life Expectancy chart illustrating this, https://www.macrotrends.net/datasets/global-metrics/countries/usa/united-states/life-expectancy

Online Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 49,037
Re: Judge Rules California's Assault Weapons Act Is Unconstitutional
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2024, 11:34:57 pm »
Wow.
Nie mój cyrk, nie moje małpy

Offline Sighlass

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,184
  • Didn't vote for McCain Dole Romney Trump !
Re: Judge Rules California's Assault Weapons Act Is Unconstitutional
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2024, 01:58:25 am »
Any other news sites chiming in on this, something other than MSM leftist with better insight? Yeah, I tried finding something about this on Youtube and came up empty.
Exodus 18:21 Furthermore, you shall select out of all the people able men who fear God, men of truth, those who hate dishonest gain; and you shall place these over them as leaders over ....

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,582
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: Judge Rules California's Assault Weapons Act Is Unconstitutional
« Reply #7 on: May 26, 2024, 04:36:10 pm »
Well, it will go to the 9th Circuit next.

Probably get reversed by the initial 3-judge panel.

Then... go for an en banc hearing.

Results... uncertain at this time (although the 9th has been putting out some surprising opinions lately).

Then, possibly to the High Court.