The Briefing Room
General Category => National/Breaking News => SCOTUS News => Topic started by: Elderberry on July 12, 2019, 06:16:47 pm
-
The Post & Email 7/12/2019
As he has in the past, New York State citizen Robert Laity on Friday sent a letter to U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts, copied to all members of that body, captioned, “Usurpations of the Presidency by fraud and subterfuge; Petition for Redress of Grievances.â€
Laity’s letter begins, “It is with intense concern for this nation’s national security that I write to you today. I have written to this court on this issue before, over a decade ago. I have also had two cases before this court on this issue.â€
As Laity further noted, he filed a lawsuit originating in the State of New York challenging the presidential eligibility of Barack Obama and more recently, a case claiming that three 2016 presidential candidates were ineligible for the office they sought.
More: https://www.thepostemail.com/2019/07/12/citizen-contacts-u-s-supreme-court-on-pattern-of-usurpations-by-presidential-candidates/ (https://www.thepostemail.com/2019/07/12/citizen-contacts-u-s-supreme-court-on-pattern-of-usurpations-by-presidential-candidates/)
-
That’ll get circular-filed toot-sweet.
-
At least he's doing something.
-
At least he's doing something.
What. Sending letters that nobody will read? He’s wasting time.
-
What. Sending letters that nobody will read? He’s wasting time.
As opposed to being nothing more than a keyboard warrior?
-
Can we please stop giving birthers like the Post & E-Mail the time of day? Their insistent ignorance is getting on my nerves and I'm starting to suspect they're being backed by foreign saboteurs. (How ironic.)
Any idiot can send a letter to SCOTUS. It literally does nothing. The courts can only take cases that are formally filed with or appealed to them. There is no birther case before the court, so this doesn't even count as an amicus brief. It's just some idiot sending a letter.
-
Can we please stop giving birthers like the Post & E-Mail the time of day? Their insistent ignorance is getting on my nerves and I'm starting to suspect they're being backed by foreign saboteurs. (How ironic.)
Any idiot can send a letter to SCOTUS. It literally does nothing. The courts can only take cases that are formally filed with or appealed to them. There is no birther case before the court, so this doesn't even count as an amicus brief. It's just some idiot sending a letter.
You need to buy a clue because currently, you have none.
-
As opposed to being nothing more than a keyboard warrior?
He’s wasting time. That letter will not be read by anyone and simply dumped in the garbage. How does that accomplish anything? In fact, given the waste of tangible resources, better he should be a keyboard warrior.
-
You need to buy a clue because currently, you have none.
He’s got a hell of a lot more than you do.
-
He’s got a hell of a lot more than you do.
He’s got a hell of a lot more than you do.
180 degrees out of phase with you is a perfect place to be.
-
https://www.wnd.com/2010/04/142101/ (https://www.wnd.com/2010/04/142101/)
Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told a House subcommittee that when it comes to determining whether a person born outside the 50 states can serve as U.S. president, the high court is “evading†the issue.
The comments came as part of Thomas’ testimony before a House appropriations panel discussing an increase in the Supreme Court’s budget earlier this week.
Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y., actually raised the question first amid a discussion on racial diversity in the judiciary.
“I’m still waiting for the [court decision] on whether or not a Puerto Rican can run for president of the United States,†said Serrano, who was born in the island territory. “That’s another issue.â€
-
You need to buy a clue because currently, you have none.
I would, but you'd FairTax it.
-
Seriously, though, this guy claims Chester Arthur was an illegitimate President, spreading debunked claims from over a century ago about where he was born. He's clearly wrong.
-
I would, but you'd FairTax it.
And you would pay with money completely untaxed before you spent it.
-
The courts prefer that congress do its job and really define the term "natural born citizen." But you know that congress won't do it. So the controversy will go on.