START THE COURT MARTIAL PROCEEDINGS: DC National Guard Whistleblower Alleges Trump’s Commander-in-Ch

[mystery-ak]

START THE COURT MARTIAL PROCEEDINGS: DC National Guard Whistleblower Alleges Trump’s Commander-in-Chief Powers Were Revoked by Military Brass During January 6 Capitol Riot
by Jim Hᴏft May. 4, 2024 8:00 am

in April the House Subcommittee on Oversight held a hearing with National Guard whistleblowers who stepped forward to correct the media lies and dishonest narrative by Democrats on the January 6 protests and riots.

Four members of the National Guard testified that they were ready to be deployed on January 6 but THE PENTAGON held them back!

This directly brings General Milley’s actions into question!

Kash Patel tipped us off last month that there were more reports like this coming.

National Guard whistleblowers: Command Sgt. Major Michael E. Brooks, Colonel Earl G. Matthews, Aaron Dean Retired, and Captain Timothy Nick stepped forward and testified before Congress to correct the record on January 6.



As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Washington DC Mayor Muriel Bowser were both warned about the security situation prior to January 6th, and both turned down National Guard troops at the US Capitol that day.

Pelosi and Mayor Muriel Bowser turned down thousands of National Guard troops at the Capitol on January 6 for political reasons.

Chris Wray’s FBI also refused to notify the Trump administration and his cabinet secretaries that they believed there could be violence like the mass protests at the Capitol that took place that day.

Nancy Pelosi also refused the National Guard at the US Capitol due to politics.

Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund said he asked House and Senate security officials for permission to request that the D.C. National Guard be placed on standby in case he needed quick backup. But they both turned him down.

John Solomon from Just The News released an explosive report in 2022 that revealed Capitol Police were first warned about possible violence at the January 6th protests TWO WEEKS before the planned rallies.

more
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/start-court-martial-proceedings-dc-national-guard-whistleblower/

[libertybele]

 

???? So if the CIC has the Constitutional powers over the military how can the military brass revoke those powers?

What am I missing here or not understanding???

[DCPatriot]

???? So if the CIC has the Constitutional powers over the military how can the military brass revoke those powers?

What am I missing here or not understanding???

You're missing a helluva lot.  Somebody go get the Kenyan. 

[Cyber Liberty]

???? So if the CIC has the Constitutional powers over the military how can the military brass revoke those powers?

What am I missing here or not understanding???

They can't.  It was highly unlawful to refuse to pass down orders from the CiC, and that's exactly what they did.  I didn't trust the Military in that regards since 1/20/17.  There was plenty of scuttlebutt going around back then when it was implied by many at the Pentagon, that Trump's commands were not absolute.  That they would intervene to be a check on Trump, who they were insisting at the time that stupid Trump would walk us straight into WWIII. 

They broke the chain of command to "save the world from Trump!"

This is the level of insubordination we're dealing with here.

[Smokin Joe]

They can't.  It was highly unlawful to refuse to pass down orders from the CiC, and that's exactly what they did.  I didn't trust the Military in that regards since 1/20/17.  There was plenty of scuttlebutt going around back then when it was implied by many at the Pentagon, that Trump's commands were not absolute.  That they would intervene to be a check on Trump, who they were insisting at the time that stupid Trump would walk us straight into WWIII. 

They broke the chain of command to "save the world from Trump!"

This is the level of insubordination we're dealing with here.

Whereas the people they sided with were plotting and perhaps actually produced illegitimate results to the election of 2020...

and

Whereas having a violent, invasive protest was essential to acceptance of those potentially illegitimate results with a minimum of dissent and with the Congress in a state of fatigue which might well render their judgement less than fully alert...

and Whereas such violent behaviour on the part of protesters might have been incited, furthered, or otherwise enhanced by the presence of agents provocateur within the protest crowd operating under a false flag, and the presence of National Guard performing security would interfere with the desired outcomes above...

Those apparently desiring those results and enabling them to achieve their desired outcomes, especially those in the direct Military Chain of Command, who acted to subvert the desire of the then President of the United States to maintain order, in fact have acted against the interests of a smooth transition of power if legitimate, the addressing of any objections to that transition as is mandated by the Rules of Congress, and acted against the best interests of these United States: to wit, as enemies of the Republic.

If it can be shown that they did so with malice and aforethought, and in collusion, this would represent a criminal conspiracy under the US code and the UCMJ as those bodies of law applied to the respective participants, and quite possibly, treason.

At the very least, the refusal to execute the orders of the Commander in Chief is a serious violation of the UCMJ, and should be tried by Military Tribunal, and in the event of a guilty verdict, punished appropriately.