Well 28 out of 30 isn't bad. 1000 v 753 is a matter of rounding off, and I wouldn't count it as a lie, and the thirtieth is a debatable point, on which neither view would count as a lie.
Of course, in saying Biden lied, this assumes he knew the truth and said something contrary to it. In fact, Biden's State of the Union speech was not so much a tissue of lies as a pile of bulls**t, using that word in the technical sense provided by Harry G. Frankfurt in his charming little book On Bulls**t: saying whatever is expedient without regard to whether it is true or false. Frankfurt concludes his small volume with the view that bulls**t is a greater enemy of truth than lying, in as much as the bulls**tter has no regard at all for the truth, while the liar knows the truth and says something contrary to it (which, as I often point out can be done for either blameworthy or praiseworthy reasons -- as an example of the latter, deceiving the enemy when prosecuting a just war).
