Author Topic: The troubling meaning of this year’s congressional retirements  (Read 245 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,253
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
The troubling meaning of this year’s congressional retirements
« on: February 15, 2024, 02:36:32 pm »
The troubling meaning of this year’s congressional retirements
By
Adam Carrington
February 15, 2024 6:00 am

We are used to congressmen running for reelection. But, in surprising numbers, they instead are running for the exits. Twenty-four House members thus far have announced they will not seek another term. Some certainly declined another run due to age. However, the numbers are too high to make that the only explanation.

The retirements seem especially troubling for the GOP. They make up 14 of the 24. Their crop of retirees also included an overall younger cohort than their Democratic counterparts. The youngest is the most recent: Mike Gallagher, who represents Wisconsin’s 8th district. Gallagher is only 39 and was widely seen as a rising star both in the party and in Congress.

This is all true despite the GOP being in the majority. It is taking place even though Republicans have a good chance of increasing that majority in the 2024 election.

What might explain these seemingly counterintuitive retirements? Some have argued it portends an internal sense that the GOP will not do as well as many right now expect in the House and the Senate elections come November. Perhaps that is true, though it seems hard to see what information of significance these congressmen would possess that the general public would not.

more
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/2856367/troubling-meaning-of-this-years-congressional-retirements/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,591
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: The troubling meaning of this year’s congressional retirements
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2024, 11:36:44 pm »
Gettin' out while the gettin's good.
For BOTH sides...

Offline Maj. Bill Martin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,861
  • Gender: Male
  • I'll make Mincemeat out of 'em"
Re: The troubling meaning of this year’s congressional retirements
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2024, 02:30:45 am »
Sounds about right:

Quote
But that is not how many House members, including in the GOP, see their office. They care little about actual legislation. They know little, and care almost nothing, about strengthening Congress’s powers in relationship to the rest of the national government. Instead, they think more about influence on social media and building toward other positions, either executive offices or lucrative private jobs.