Author Topic: ‘Shouting Match’ Erupts In Senate GOP Conference Over Border Bill  (Read 373 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Timber Rattler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,693
  • Conservative Purist and Patriot
https://conservativebrief.com/shouting-reported-80966/

Quote
Some Republican senators were overheard engaging in loud conversations behind closed doors as they debated legislation that would provide some funding for the border but much more in aid to countries like Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan.

Fox News Capitol Hill reporter Aishah Hasnie told the network program “America’s Newsroom” Tuesday morning that even one of the bill’s co-sponsors, Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma, is now likely to vote against it because of its highly controversial provisions such as continuing to allow thousands of illegal migrants into the country daily before President Joe Biden would be compelled to shut the border down.

Here’s what Hasnie told Fox News:

While the past 24 hours have been nothing short of stunning here, we knew that this border deal was dead on arrival in the House, but it’s not likely to make it out of the Senate at all. Republicans are poised to take a procedural vote on this tomorrow, and it’s likely at the author of this big bipartisan deal. The Republican author is likely to vote no on it as well, as well as a Senate majority leader or minority leader.

Senate Republicans met last night at a closed-door meeting, which got so heated, Dana, at times, that myself and other reporters could actually hear screaming coming from inside the room. When leader Mitch McConnell emerged from the room, he told me that he had a great discussion and that the conference will keep on talking.

Now, Senator James Lankford, the lead GOP negotiator on this, told me it is clear that the majority of the conference is not ready to vote on this thing, but that there is still interest in adding real amendments and shaping into something, perhaps, that they can stomach. He insists, though, the bill is not dead, but it looks like he may also vote no tomorrow, just for the sake of party unity. Democrats are already lashing out on that lead,

Democrat negotiator Chris Murphy tweeting this honestly, this is so embarrassing. You told us you wanted a bipartisan border fix. You appointed the Republican negotiator. We got a deal. Stop the drama. Now, there were three senators on the left that had also rejected the bill. But the goal really here, Dana, was to get half of each conference on board. That is not going to happen. Leader Schumer is expected to go on and put this on the floor for a cloture vote tomorrow. Again, that’s expected to fail. As all eyes now shift to the House, where we are watching this impeachment in a few hours.

EXCERPT

They should bring back dueling...
aka "nasty degenerate SOB," "worst of the worst at Free Republic," "Garbage Troll," "Neocon Warmonger," "Filthy Piece of Trash," "damn $#%$#@!," "Silly f'er," "POS," "war pig," "neocon scumbag," "insignificant little ankle nipper," "@ss-clown," "neocuck," "termite," "Uniparty Deep stater," "Never Trump sack of dog feces," "avid Bidenista," "filthy Ukrainian," "war whore," "fricking chump," psychopathic POS, and depraved SOB.

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."  ---George Orwell

"If you want peace, prepare for war." ---Flavius Vegetius Renatus

Offline HikerGuy83

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,467
  • Gender: Male
  • Still Trying
Re: ‘Shouting Match’ Erupts In Senate GOP Conference Over Border Bill
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2024, 02:17:03 pm »
The idiots we call GOP senators can't seem to learn the value of good optics. 

Because they come across as idiots all the time. 

This is just another example.

It does not help that Trump said kill it and they seemed to turn on it pretty quickly.

Offline catfish1957

  • Laken Riley.... Say her Name. And to every past and future democrat voter- Her blood is on your hands too!!!
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,480
  • Gender: Male
Re: ‘Shouting Match’ Erupts In Senate GOP Conference Over Border Bill
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2024, 02:23:31 pm »
The idiots we call GOP senators can't seem to learn the value of good optics. 

Because they come across as idiots all the time. 

This is just another example.

It does not help that Trump said kill it and they seemed to turn on it pretty quickly.

Outside of optics, and in our defense at least our side  thoughtfully reviews, and  has independent thought and debate.

Versus our enemy the dims who are basically lockstep like U.S.S.R.  socialist.  Watch how often they vote unanimously as a bloc.
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.

Offline HikerGuy83

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,467
  • Gender: Male
  • Still Trying
Re: ‘Shouting Match’ Erupts In Senate GOP Conference Over Border Bill
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2024, 02:35:02 pm »
Outside of optics, and in our defense at least our side  thoughtfully reviews, and  has independent thought and debate.

Versus our enemy the dims who are basically lockstep like U.S.S.R.  socialist.  Watch how often they vote unanimously as a bloc.

GOP senators have thoughts ? 

Who knew ?

Wonder what McConnell was thinking by encouraging Langford in his negotiations....before pulling the rug out from under his feet ?

Or maybe you can explain why they killed the bill at all ?

5,000 to much ?  How, the eff, much is it now ?
« Last Edit: February 08, 2024, 02:36:44 pm by HikerGuy83 »

Offline Timber Rattler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,693
  • Conservative Purist and Patriot
Re: ‘Shouting Match’ Erupts In Senate GOP Conference Over Border Bill
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2024, 03:10:38 pm »
GOP senators have thoughts ? 

Who knew ?

Wonder what McConnell was thinking by encouraging Langford in his negotiations....before pulling the rug out from under his feet ?

Or maybe you can explain why they killed the bill at all ?

5,000 to much ?  How, the eff, much is it now ?

Reminds me of when McConnell sent Rubio to negotiate as part of the original "Gang of 8" on an illegal immigration "reform" bill, only to yank the rug out from under him too when word got out about its amnesty provisions.
aka "nasty degenerate SOB," "worst of the worst at Free Republic," "Garbage Troll," "Neocon Warmonger," "Filthy Piece of Trash," "damn $#%$#@!," "Silly f'er," "POS," "war pig," "neocon scumbag," "insignificant little ankle nipper," "@ss-clown," "neocuck," "termite," "Uniparty Deep stater," "Never Trump sack of dog feces," "avid Bidenista," "filthy Ukrainian," "war whore," "fricking chump," psychopathic POS, and depraved SOB.

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."  ---George Orwell

"If you want peace, prepare for war." ---Flavius Vegetius Renatus

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,601
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: ‘Shouting Match’ Erupts In Senate GOP Conference Over Border Bill
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2024, 11:48:50 pm »
I've come to the conclusion that having a "Senate" (as a part of the U.S. legislative branch) may no longer actually serve the interests of the American people.

Not sure what could replace it, but I'm open to ideas.

Having said that, I read a very interesting comment a day or two ago that suggested that the House be "revised" so that members serve 4-year terms instead of two, and run for election in even-numbered years that are "opposite" those of presidential elections.

Sounds good to me that members would have to run on their records, instead of relying on coat-tails...

Offline HikerGuy83

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,467
  • Gender: Male
  • Still Trying
Re: ‘Shouting Match’ Erupts In Senate GOP Conference Over Border Bill
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2024, 12:01:16 am »
I've come to the conclusion that having a "Senate" (as a part of the U.S. legislative branch) may no longer actually serve the interests of the American people.

Not sure what could replace it, but I'm open to ideas.

Having said that, I read a very interesting comment a day or two ago that suggested that the House be "revised" so that members serve 4-year terms instead of two, and run for election in even-numbered years that are "opposite" those of presidential elections.

Sounds good to me that members would have to run on their records, instead of relying on coat-tails...

Totally correct.

We really screwed ourselves with the 17th amendment.