COVID: the vaccine that wasn't, and the truth

[mystery-ak]

February 3, 2024
COVID: the vaccine that wasn't, and the truth
By Mike McDaniel

Americans have lost faith in our health establishment. They’re now absolutely science deniers, if the “science” is being mandated by the CDC, NIH, or people like Anthony Fauci, who recently admitted that six foot social distancing just sort of appeared as if by magic. Despite being science itself, Fauci finally coughed up the reality there was no actual science involved. Despite long ago learning the various Covid vaccines aren’t vaccines—they don’t prevent contracting or transmitting the disease—and can cause side effects like death, the health mafia continues to claim its essential everyone get a never-ending series of ineffective and dangerous vaccines and boosters.

Finally, there appears to be some non-Fauci science out there. You know: the real thing:

    It only took four years, the courage of a handful of independent medical experts who risked their careers by contradicting the federal government, the mainstream media, and the medical establishment, and the fact that something resembling the free press remains viable in this country, thanks largely to the internet.

    Now, finally, the truth about the COVID-19 vaccine is beginning to be made known to the public. It confirms the many previous warnings such as these: here, here, and here.

    It's a research paper entitled “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign” that appeared on the internet at the Cureus Journal of Medical Science. The abstract bears your close reading and then re-reading, especially if you are one of the millions of Americans who did what public health gurus like Dr. Anthony Fauci incessantly told us to do and "followed the science."

more
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/02/covid_the_vaccine_that_wasnt_and_the_truth.html

[libertybele]

It continues ...reports...data of serious adverse effects and even death:   

Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards.

[mountaineer]

Now Fauci admits that COVID vaccines actually cause MYOCARDITIS particularly in young men.

https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1764436329121579255

[Smokin Joe]

 

[Bigun]

I'll join in!   

[Smokin Joe]

I'll join in!   

Welcome aboard! 

[roamer_1]

Yeah.

[mountaineer]

Jeff Carlson
@themarketswork
Another fishy thing: The first place the new mRNA technology was employed was in the development of new mRNA vaccines that were intended for use against the 2018 outbreaks of Ebola in West Africa.

But, as John Hopkins noted, "since that virus is only found in a limited number of African countries, it had no commercial development in the U.S.”

So, from the viewpoint of the pharma companies, they had this newly improved mRNA technology that they theoretically could use to make much cheaper “vaccine alternatives” but they had no large, commercially viable markets in which to sell this new technology.

And of course, there were no long-term safety studies of the mRNA vaccines. In other words, if things continued as they had pre-Covid, it would have likely been years, perhaps even decades, before mRNA vaccines would have been accepted or used in the Western world. But then Covid hit and everything changed.

Side Note: Many have speculated the Zaire Ebola outbreak may have come the Kenema Lab in Sierra Leone. The outbreak happened in the near vicinity of the lab - more than 3,000km away from Zaire Ebola's natural source in the Congo.

Those running the lab: Proximal Origin authors Kristian Andersen & Robert Garry. Small world, isn't it...
12:48 PM · Mar 15, 2024

Thomas Massie
@RepThomasMassie
A fishy thing:
The mRNA vaccine was trialed within 2 months of COVID appearing in the U.S., but it took a year to come up with a vaccine to target a slight variant.
Inference: The original variant was built by humans to develop the vaccine; that’s how we had its blueprint.
11:11 AM · Mar 15, 2024

[corbe]

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

“The Pandemic no longer controls our lives. The Vaccines that saved us from COVID are now being used to help beat Cancer – Turning setback into comeback!” YOU’RE WELCOME, JOE, NINE MONTH APPROVAL TIME VS. 12 YEARS THAT IT WOULD HAVE TAKEN YOU!



3.41k

ReTruths

23.6k

Likes
Mar 07, 2024, 8:47 PM

[PeteS in CA]

Jeff Carlson
@themarketswork
Another fishy thing: The first place the new mRNA technology was employed was in the development of new mRNA vaccines that were intended for use against the 2018 outbreaks of Ebola in West Africa.

But, as John Hopkins noted, "since that virus is only found in a limited number of African countries, it had no commercial development in the U.S.”
...

In the real world, attempts to produce an Ebola vaccine with traditional protein sub-unit and dead virus technologies had failed. How is it "fishy" that mRNA technology was tried? Non sequitur.

Anti-Covid-Vaxxers try to tar Moderna and BioNTech with Big Bad Bogey-Pharma, because it makes demonizing Moderna and BioNTech easy. In the real world, Moderna and BioNTech are very small companies. in 2019, neither had production capacity beyond what was needed for their lab work and possibly a Phase 1 clinical trial (which is small scale). Picking Ebola for vaccine development made sense because the large pharmaceuticals companies would not be competitors who could swamp them from the market if they succeeded. When Covid came, developing an mRNA vaccine would be much quicker, because they did not need to culture the virus to produce candidate vaccines as protein sub-unit and dead virus technologies do. The virus DNA sequence was all they needed. But being small companies, Moderna had to use contract manufacturers for production and distribution, and BioNTech partnered with Pfizer for production and distribution.

So there was nothing "fishy" except to those who want there to be some sort of Big Bad Bogey-Pharma conspiracy.

[roamer_1]

In the real world, attempts to produce an Ebola vaccine with traditional protein sub-unit and deadvirus technologies had failed. How is it "fishy" that mRNA technology was tried? Non sequitur.

Because they outlawed proven antivirals. It's really all you need to know.
There is no reason to do that without being nefarious.

Now, it may not be the reasons supposed, but it doesn't have to be. For whatever reason, they f***ed with peoples' lives. On purpose.

Whatever lies beyond that truth is not beyond the pale. To purposefully deny antivirals in the face of an epidemic is beyond the pale all by itself - To the tune of hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths.

What answer would make that worse, or better?

[PeteS in CA]

Because they outlawed proven antivirals. It's really all you need to know.
There is no reason to do that without being nefarious.
...

So. the antiviral remdesivir doesn't exist and wasn't tested and approved for use with Covid? Paxlovid doesn't exist, etc.?

[roamer_1]

So. the antiviral remdesivir doesn't exist and wasn't tested and approved for use with Covid? Paxlovid doesn't exist, etc.?

No one here forgets the outlawed first line antivirals - Ivermectin and the entire quinine family, all cyclines. Couldn't get em to save your soul.

My dear sainted mother, sucking horse paste. I won't forget, them sonsabiches.

[DB]

So. the antiviral remdesivir doesn't exist and wasn't tested and approved for use with Covid? Paxlovid doesn't exist, etc.?

There was nothing "proven" about remdesivir and Covid. But it made a lot of money for big pharma and killed a lot of people.

[Smokin Joe]

So. the antiviral remdesivir doesn't exist and wasn't tested and approved for use with Covid? Paxlovid doesn't exist, etc.?

Remdesivir may have been approved, but it is well known for causing kidney damage.
https://www.scielosp.org/article/csp/2021.v37n10/e00077721/ Paxlovid did not exist.
Zinc was known in 2005 to stop SARS virus replication in vitro and in vivo (peer reviewed study). Oddly enough (as in who'd have thought?) Zinc supplementation was part of both three part regimens against COVID. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin were intended to function as ionophores for the Zinc, and the macrolide antibiotics were to mute immune response to prevent a Cytokine Storm, and to ward off opportunistic bacterial infections. The regimens were intended to be early onset treatments (as soon as symptoms appeared), not so much for use on ICU patients.