Screenshot: Kentucky Had The Same Problem As PA With “Votes Getting Flipped” Early In The Governor’

[American Girl]

Someone, please explain how Kentucky Republicans can vote in the GOP AG and SOS by 17%- 22% ... And then vote for the Democrat for governor. How does that work?

Do libs think we forget to fill in the ballot for Governor? Liberals are cheaters and liars and no election is ever to be trusted.
https://www.rightjournalism.com/screenshot-kentucky-had-the-same-problem-as-pa-with-votes-getting-flipped-early-in-the-governors-race-here-are-the-details/

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

Oh God, here it comes: we either win elections, or we were cheated.

[Free Vulcan]

It does bother me that Bashear can win the Governorship like that while other state Republican candidates are winning by 20%. It's too much of an anomaly to not question and at least investigate.

With the GOP firmly in control of everything else, they can do that if they have the political will.

[dfwgator]

It does bother me that Bashear can win the Governorship like that while other state Republican candidates are winning by 20%. It's too much of an anomaly to not question and at least investigate.

With the GOP firmly in control of everything else, they can do that if they have the political will.

Women think Beshear is just dreamy, even the "Republican" women.

[Bigun]

It does bother me that Bashear can win the Governorship like that while other state Republican candidates are winning by 20%. It's too much of an anomaly to not question and at least investigate.

With the GOP firmly in control of everything else, they can do that if they have the political will.

 

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

It does bother me that Bashear can win the Governorship like that while other state Republican candidates are winning by 20%. It's too much of an anomaly to not question and at least investigate.

With the GOP firmly in control of everything else, they can do that if they have the political will.

Because a lot of people don't vote at all downballot. Same thing happens here in NH.

[Free Vulcan]

Because a lot of people don't vote at all downballot. Same thing happens here in NH.

There looks to be some of that, but not enough to flip the race. He would have needed alot of GOP crossover to win when the other state candidates came out ahead with such a large margin, which in the current environment seems unlikely. Never got the impression that he's that popular of a Governor.

[Bigun]

There looks to be some of that, but not enough to flip the race. He would have needed alot of GOP crossover to win when the other state candidates came out ahead with such a large margin, which in the current environment seems unlikely. Never got the impression that he's that popular of a Governor.

Exactly right! I've never seen anything like it prior to 2020.

[LMAO]

Oh God, here it comes: we either win elections, or we were cheated.

Of course, that was going to eventually come up

[Fishrrman]

There's "another factor" why Cameron didn't get the votes down in ol' Kentucky.
(that's all I'll say about it)

[Smokin Joe]

Oh God, here it comes: we either win elections, or we were cheated.

If the other side is committing vote fraud, you are unlikely to win.

[DefiantMassRINO]

 

The only question is ... was it Hugo Chavez's ghost or his parrot behind the shenanigans?

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

If the other side is committing vote fraud, you are unlikely to win.

Yeah but this seems to be the excuse every election. With no proof/convictions. Just deflections.

[Free Vulcan]

Yeah but this seems to be the excuse every election. With no proof/convictions. Just deflections.

And I agree on that. The time to fix voter fraud is ahead of the next election, not after the fact. At that point you are just spittin' into the wind.

[jmyrlefuller]

If the other side is committing vote fraud, you are unlikely to win.

I mean, if the Dems had fraud figured out, why would they do it for only one race?

[Timber Rattler]

There's "another factor" why Cameron didn't get the votes down in ol' Kentucky.
(that's all I'll say about it)

Yep.   

[sneakypete]

Yeah but this seems to be the excuse every election. With no proof/convictions. Just deflections.

@Weird Tolkienish Figure

There seems to be plenty of proof,but with the Dims in power in the states where this is happening,there is never going to be anything done about it.

"We,the people..." are now nothing more than accessories/window dressings when it comes to elections.

[Free Vulcan]

I mean, if the Dems had fraud figured out, why would they do it for only one race?

Because there are limits to fraud. You can't make up the votes when you're down 20% or more on a statewide race. Those extra votes will have to come from a limited number of Rat areas with corrupt county election heads.

You can't create a situation where the number of Rat votes is 400% of the number of registered Rats, and 200% of the census population in a given jurisdiction for example and take a chance of getting exposed and killing the golden goose.

[Smokin Joe]

Yeah but this seems to be the excuse every election. With no proof/convictions. Just deflections.

There is plenty of proof for 2020, NONE of which was ever examined in court, because the cases were dismissed on 'standing' or some other technicality, and SCOTUS refused to hear a dispute between States (where they have primary jurisdiction). No one in the judiciary wanted to come close to it. (F'n cowards!)
It took fewer than 250,000 votes to sway the five critical states, (well, that was the total 'margin of victory', anyway, because despite the popular vote appearing to be six million different, it is the electoral votes which count, and those votes decided that.) Now whether they were brought out from under the table after poll watchers were told counting for the night was over because a urinal leaked in a different part of the building (the so-called "water main break") or they were counted behind cardboard and other coverings on the windows, what happened was not legit.

By denying that anything untoward happened, some folks can blame Trump, just like the Democrats, and this travesty will continue. Enjoy feeling smug as much as you want, but the aftertaste of this will linger long after Trump is gone.
Now that irregularities

[sneakypete]

There is plenty of proof for 2020, NONE of which was ever examined in court, because the cases were dismissed on 'standing' or some other technicality, and SCOTUS refused to hear a dispute between States (where they have primary jurisdiction). No one in the judiciary wanted to come close to it. (F'n cowards!)
It took fewer than 250,000 votes to sway the five critical states, (well, that was the total 'margin of victory', anyway, because despite the popular vote appearing to be six million different, it is the electoral votes which count, and those votes decided that.) Now whether they were brought out from under the table after poll watchers were told counting for the night was over because a urinal leaked in a different part of the building (the so-called "water main break") or they were counted behind cardboard and other coverings on the windows, what happened was not legit.

By denying that anything untoward happened, some folks can blame Trump, just like the Democrats, and this travesty will continue. Enjoy feeling smug as much as you want, but the aftertaste of this will linger long after Trump is gone.
Now that irregularities

@Smokin Joe

Yup!

Every word true,and the scariest part to ME is that so many  alleged Republicans don't give a damn because they THINK it was Rude Orange Man that  was hurt,when the reality is that it was AMERICA that was hurt,and is STILL being hurt.

This tendency to ignore illegal votes IS going to be the end of America as a free and independent nation.

[DefiantMassRINO]

Blaming election loses on unproven voter fraud is a false narrative that allows failed party leaders to escape culpability for their failures.

Keeping failed leaders responsible for failed campaigns will only lead to more failure.

[Timber Rattler]

Blaming election loses on unproven voter fraud is a false narrative that allows failed party leaders to escape culpability for their failures.

Keeping failed leaders responsible for failed campaigns will only lead to more failure.

 

 

[Smokin Joe]

Blaming election loses on unproven voter fraud is a false narrative that allows failed party leaders to escape culpability for their failures.

Keeping failed leaders responsible for failed campaigns will only lead to more failure.

Believe what you will. Accept the 'official' version from the MSM if you want to.

Or you can look at the evidence. The courts couldn't be bothered. If the corrupt or intimidated courts summary dismissals and the cowardice of the SCOTUS (which had primary jurisdiction in a case between States) preclude judicial proof because the courts refused to even look at the evidence and you want to accept that, that is your folly.

It is easy to say "unproven", it takes a bit more to actually look at the data which would constitute proof in any fair hearing.  Considering the treatment the SCOTUS Justices got over Dobbs, and in the context of rioters and looters physically attacking people and burning business districts, that the court succumbed to fear of the mobs is conceivable, as is the possibility someone had some leverage on the Justices themselves.

I do know this much. Biden being honestly elected with a record number of votes, ever is something I consider highly unlikely. Election fraud has consequences, and the worst are yet to come.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

Blaming election loses on unproven voter fraud is a false narrative that allows failed party leaders to escape culpability for their failures.

Keeping failed leaders responsible for failed campaigns will only lead to more failure.

Also, what motivates people to vote if all we do is scream that it's basically pointless due to fraud?

[Bigun]

Believe what you will. Accept the 'official' version from the MSM if you want to.

Or you can look at the evidence. The courts couldn't be bothered. If the corrupt or intimidated courts summary dismissals and the cowardice of the SCOTUS (which had primary jurisdiction in a case between States) preclude judicial proof because the courts refused to even look at the evidence and you want to accept that, that is your folly.

It is easy to say "unproven", it takes a bit more to actually look at the data which would constitute proof in any fair hearing.  Considering the treatment the SCOTUS Justices got over Dobbs, and in the context of rioters and looters physically attacking people and burning business districts, that the court succumbed to fear of the mobs is conceivable, as is the possibility someone had some leverage on the Justices themselves.

I do know this much. Biden being honestly elected with a record number of votes, ever is something I consider highly unlikely. Election fraud has consequences, and the worst are yet to come.

This!