24 Years Wiped from Life Expectancy of ‘Fully Boosted’ Men, Study Shows

[rangerrebew]

24 Years Wiped from Life Expectancy of ‘Fully Boosted’ Men, Study Shows
By Pamela Geller - on September 18, 2023
 
A person who received five doses would be 350% more likely than an unvaxxed person to die in 2031, 700% more likely to die in 2041, and 1050% more likely to die in 2051. How much more will the new jabs steal?

There has been no mea culpa, no hesitation, no cessation of mass inoculations. On the contrary, the more people die or suffer lifelong health damage, the more it is ignored and denied.

24 Years Wiped from Life Expectancy of ‘Fully Boosted’ Men, Study Shows
Frank BergmanSeptember 13, 2023 – 12:57 pm4 Comments

An explosive new study has revealed that American men who have been “fully boosted” with Covid shots will suffer a staggering 24-year loss in their life expectancy.

https://gellerreport.com/2023/09/24-years-wiped-from-life-expectancy-of-fully-boosted-men-study-shows.html/

[rangerrebew]

Got to make room for all the illegals!

[PeteS in CA]

  Covid boosters were being given 20 years before Covid existed? Some anti-Covid-vaxxer yanked that "24 years" number out of their rectum, because it's still over 20 years in the future from when boosters started being administered.

I could, with the same evidence - NONE - claim that Covd boosters add 30 years to every recipients life. But I'm not that stupid and dishonest.

What stupid clickbait claptrap!

[libertybele]

Covid boosters were being given 20 years before Covid existed? Some anti-Covid-vaxxer yanked that "24 years" number out of their rectum, because it's still over 20 years in the future from when boosters started being administered.

I could, with the same evidence - NONE - claim that Covd boosters add 30 years to every recipients life. But I'm not that stupid and dishonest.

What stupid clickbait claptrap!

Agreed -- it is not clear at how they derived at the 24 years -- but --- the data does indicate:

Researchers have analyzed the official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the UK government to determine the long-term effects of mRNA injections.

The study sought to weigh the balance of risk for the vaccines by establishing how long the negative side effects take to reduce over time after a person receives each dose.

However, the researchers found that the damage doesn’t lessen over time and, instead, it remains indefinitely, increasing with each shot.

The CDC All-Cause Mortality data has shown that each vaccine dose increased mortality by seven percent in the year 2022 compared to the same figures for 2021.

This is one study.  IF other research and other studies reveal similar data, then I'd say there is definitely cause for concern.

I personally lean towards the data being correct regarding people dying from the vaccine(s); but I still don't see how they can conclude the 24 year decrease in life expectancy.

[catfish1957]

Guess the dims have to weed out all those old white men who are terrorist.

[Smokin Joe]

Covid boosters were being given 20 years before Covid existed? Some anti-Covid-vaxxer yanked that "24 years" number out of their rectum, because it's still over 20 years in the future from when boosters started being administered.

I could, with the same evidence - NONE - claim that Covd boosters add 30 years to every recipients life. But I'm not that stupid and dishonest.

What stupid clickbait claptrap!

Right. Line up the illegals and give them all the shots. Or they can go back where they came from. Can't be too careful, right?
 

Seriously, though, I, in typical fashion ground back to the study cited and linked in the SLAY article this post was based on: (Link provided so you can read it if you are interested)
 Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full.pdf.

I found numerous statements to the effect that their study of vaccine efficacy was complicated by individuals with prior infections of COVID and who had thus acquired natural immunity, regardless of the variant they had caught.
However, I found no indication that the study considered reduced lifespans, nor any mention of that possible aspect in the study. The linked study did not support the contention of the article. If I missed a link, let me know.

(This is why I like to go back to the prime source, rather than rely on commentary).

I'm a fan of Pam Geller, she points out a lot of stuff in a very timely fashion, but in the words of Ronald Reagan: "Trust, but verify."

Maybe SLAY linked the wrong study.

[Smokin Joe]

Right. Line up the illegals and give them all the shots. Or they can go back where they came from. Can't be too careful, right?
 

Seriously, though, I, in typical fashion ground back to the study cited and linked in the SLAY article this post was based on: (Link provided so you can read it if you are interested)
 Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full.pdf.

I found numerous statements to the effect that their study of vaccine efficacy was complicated by individuals with prior infections of COVID and who had thus acquired natural immunity, regardless of the variant they had caught.
However, I found no indication that the study considered reduced lifespans, nor any mention of that possible aspect in the study. The linked study did not support the contention of the article. If I missed a link, let me know.

(This is why I like to go back to the prime source, rather than rely on commentary).

I'm a fan of Pam Geller, she points out a lot of stuff in a very timely fashion, but in the words of Ronald Reagan: "Trust, but verify."

Maybe SLAY linked the wrong study.

Well, the first link led to that study (above), the second link, farther in, led to this: https://expose-news.com/2023/09/01/c19-jab-reduces-lives-of-men-by-24-years/

Links within that article are to studies or data piecemeal, which may not be a valid way to assemble a conclusion, but I still fail to see how the numbers of reduced life expectancy are derived.

While I still believe that those who suffer adverse effects may well experience reduced life expectancy (sometimes severely reduced), to assert that all will be equally adversely affected is a stretch for me, as that has not been supported by the data.

As for effects on the immune system, those have been documented and may be batch dependent like the frequency of adverse event reports appear to be (some batches (lots) have very high numbers of VAERS reports vs other batches).

It will take a bit more for me to be convinced.