Author Topic: Federal Court Rules Against FDA Over Anti-Ivermectin Posts  (Read 394 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online bigheadfred

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,605
  • Gender: Male
  • One day Closer
Federal Court Rules Against FDA Over Anti-Ivermectin Posts
« on: September 03, 2023, 01:18:13 pm »
By Zachary Stieber
9/2/2023
Updated: 9/2/2023

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) likely overstepped its authority when it told Americans to "stop" using ivermectin against COVID-19, a federal court ruled on Sept. 1.

"FDA can inform, but it has identified no authority allowing it to recommend consumers 'stop' taking medicine,"  U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett wrote in the ruling.

The FDA has authority under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to convey information to consumers.

The FDA during the COVID-19 pandemic has issued multiple statements discouraging people from taking ivermectin against COVID-19.

Accompanied by a picture of a horse and a link to an FDA webpage on ivermectin, the agency wrote in one social media post: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”

Three doctors sued the FDA over its statements on ivermectin, arguing the agency cannot advise doctors on which drugs to prescribe.

Ivermectin is approved by the agency as an antiparasitic drug for both humans and animals.

Federal law gives the government immunity against legal actions, with some exceptions. One exception, known as ultra vires, is when an official acts outside their authority. Plaintiffs challenging the acts must show that the official was "acting ‘without any authority whatever,’ or without any ‘colorable basis for the exercise of authority,'" according to an earlier court ruling.

The FDA does have the authority to share data and facts, the parties agree. But they diverge on whether the FDA can issue recommendations on medical matters, such as treatments.

More

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/federal-court-rules-against-fda-over-anti-ivermectin-posts-5485397?utm_source=epochHG&utm_campaign=CFP&src_src=epochHG&src_cmp=CFP
She asked me name my foe then. I said the need within some men to fight and kill their brothers without thought of Love or God. Ken Hensley

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51,591
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Re: Federal Court Rules Against FDA Over Anti-Ivermectin Posts
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2023, 01:29:14 pm »
By Zachary Stieber
9/2/2023
Updated: 9/2/2023

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) likely overstepped its authority when it told Americans to "stop" using ivermectin against COVID-19, a federal court ruled on Sept. 1.

"FDA can inform, but it has identified no authority allowing it to recommend consumers 'stop' taking medicine,"  U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett wrote in the ruling.

The FDA has authority under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to convey information to consumers.

The FDA during the COVID-19 pandemic has issued multiple statements discouraging people from taking ivermectin against COVID-19.

Accompanied by a picture of a horse and a link to an FDA webpage on ivermectin, the agency wrote in one social media post: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”

Three doctors sued the FDA over its statements on ivermectin, arguing the agency cannot advise doctors on which drugs to prescribe.

Ivermectin is approved by the agency as an antiparasitic drug for both humans and animals.

Federal law gives the government immunity against legal actions, with some exceptions. One exception, known as ultra vires, is when an official acts outside their authority. Plaintiffs challenging the acts must show that the official was "acting ‘without any authority whatever,’ or without any ‘colorable basis for the exercise of authority,'" according to an earlier court ruling.

The FDA does have the authority to share data and facts, the parties agree. But they diverge on whether the FDA can issue recommendations on medical matters, such as treatments.

More

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/federal-court-rules-against-fda-over-anti-ivermectin-posts-5485397?utm_source=epochHG&utm_campaign=CFP&src_src=epochHG&src_cmp=CFP

 :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

FWIW, Don Willett is a Texan and a damned good lawyer and jurist.
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Online Texas Yellow Rose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,419
  • Gender: Female
  • Native Texan
Re: Federal Court Rules Against FDA Over Anti-Ivermectin Posts
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2023, 03:35:26 pm »
 :hands:

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36,593
Re: Federal Court Rules Against FDA Over Anti-Ivermectin Posts
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2023, 05:01:24 pm »
Federal law gives the government immunity against legal actions, with some exceptions. One exception, known as ultra vires, is when an official acts outside their authority. Plaintiffs challenging the acts must show that the official was "acting ‘without any authority whatever,’ or without any ‘colorable basis for the exercise of authority,'" according to an earlier court ruling.

So if the federal government operated outside its authority (as this judge ruled), then they can be sued.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.

-Dwight Eisenhower-


"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."

-Ayn Rand-