This is a "huff your chest cause your pissed" move on her part.
She (and that idiot Sotomeyer) know full good and well that there is a very limited set of circumstances that would allow any kind of so-called "discrimination".
We allow conciencious objectors (or used to). This is much that same.
Nobody in AZ is going to discriminate and she knows it. In a very small place (similar to the Colorado case) it would happen and if she moved to stop it, she'd be shot down.
The article is the bloviating piece. She didn't say shove it, they did. Part of the left wing hype.
She should be in front of a inquiry though for being critical of a SCOTUS decision. In her job, she does not have the right to that kind of opinion and saying she might behave otherwise is impeachable in my estimation.
She loses more than she wins here.
