Sounds like you're perfectly fine with using proven and rampant government fraud, corruption, sedition, tyrannical lawfare and denial of Constitutionally guaranteed rights against someone you don't happen to like [...]
Not at all - And I am on the record DEFENDING him in many cases.
That doesn't mean I have to agree with him, or, God forbid, vote for him.
Or be blind to his own culpability in his various and sundry dilemmas.
---- and enjoy snuggling in bed with Obama, Clinton, Pelosi, Schiff, Liz Cheney, Kinzinger, Wray, Comey, McCabe and Garland, et al.
You may yet be named a founding father of the Fascist wing of the "principled conservative" movement.
A GLARING false dichotomy wrapped in a juvenile insult... How predictable.
The logical course of which is:
If you ain't for Tumpy you are for, or with, 'Obama, Clinton, Pelosi, Schiff, Liz Cheney, Kinzinger, Wray, Comey, McCabe and Garland, et al.'
A ridiculous assertion that holds no weight.
A thousand times I have cried, "A pox on BOTH their houses." And it applies here.
I am with neither. BOTH sides are a stench in the nostrils.
And that is a perfectly valid position, and why you find me defending Conservatism rather than Republicans, and certainly in the main, rather than big.gov populist drama queen Tumpy.