Author Topic: Washington Post: Yes, the Biden Loan Forgiveness May Be Unconstitutional But…  (Read 342 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,410
JONATHAN TURLEY 3/3/2023

The Washington Post is now admitting that President Joe Biden’s college loan forgiveness plan is unconstitutional, but it insists that the “the court shouldn’t stop him.” The reason is standing and the Post is now apparently a standing hawk forced to accept a half trillion dollar give-away to maintain a narrow view of case or controversies under Article III.  The Post previously ran opinion pieces saying that Biden clearly has this authority, but this is an opinion piece from the editors themselves on the subject.

The Post now admits with some of us that Biden “overreached” in his use of the HEROES Act to allow him to unilaterally cancel roughly 500 billion dollars in loan debts. Executive “overreach” is a common reference to exceeding the authority afforded by Article II. The Post describes the action as “bad” and without congressional approval. Of course, giving away half a trillion dollars without congressional approval was the type of unilateral action that the Framers sought to prevent in giving Congress the power of the pursue. In other words, it is not just “bad.” It is unconstitutional.

President Biden is using a law designed to help service members and their families deal with debt accrued in fighting for this country. The terms of the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students (HEROES) Act of 2003 allows the secretary of education “to waive or modify … financial assistance program requirements … affected by a war, other military operation, or national emergency.” Biden had promised to wipe out tuition debt in the campaign and simply hijacked the Act for that unintended purpose. Putting that aside, the Act ties such relief to an inability to cover such costs due to the war or emergency. The Biden plan would use the law to benefit individuals without such a showing, including many of the 40 million beneficiaries who are relatively wealthy and could pay off the loans.

Various professors including Dalié Jiménez, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine, filed an amicus brief in support of the Administration and claimed that the HEROES Act “is as clear as sunlight” in authorizing the department’s action.

More: https://jonathanturley.org/2023/03/03/washington-post-yes-the-biden-loan-forgiveness-is-unconstitutional-but/

Online GtHawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,780
  • Gender: Male
  • I don't believe in Trump anymore, he's an illusion
But me no buts and don't pick my pocket to pay for the bad decisions of others nor tell me that it's okay even if  it's unconstitutional because it's being done by a democrat.(standing is just blowing air up Americans' asses)

Offline Kamaji

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,904
Quote
The Washington Post is now admitting that President Joe Biden’s college loan forgiveness plan is unconstitutional, but it insists that the “the court shouldn’t stop him.”

That is a very dangerous precedent for the WaPo, or any lib/prog, to be advancing.  Let's put the shoe on the other foot:  A right-wing publication acknowedges that President X's plan to incarcerate all urban ghetto blacks in internment camps in the Nevada desert is unconstitutional, but insists that the Supreme Court shouldn't stop him.  Precedent?  The Supreme Court validating the unconstitutional loan forgiveness plan of (P)resident Bidet.

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,572
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Kamaji, what do you expect the leftist/communist W Post to say?

They know that the Supreme Court is going to strike this loan cancellation down, so they have to prepare their readership for what's coming...