@Bigun @roamer_1 I agree with you both that the breakdown of the family unit is a problem. A big problem.
And in a lot of cases it has to do with increased reliance of the government. But it also has to do with the mobility of today's society. I don't see that changing anytime soon. Very few families stay intact anymore. That really isn't new either. People have been loading up in Conestogas or schooners to seek their fortune for a long time.
It's like an established oak tree drops it's acorns. A bird comes along, picks the acorns up and carry them to a remote area. The acorns grow into new trees. The new trees are pretty busy growing and really can't support the original tree. The new job is a hassel and the kids have the flu.
For that reason, as much as I believe that family should be the first line of defense, I don't see it returning. Our churches are crumbling. Second line of defense gone. The return to state assistance is a great idea. But still tax supported (maybe better controlled, idk).
I guess the point of this long and boring post is...the way SS has been presented is as a retirement plan. I get it. It isn't and is unconstitutional. I get that as well. But the majority of people believe it is "their" money.
I actually don't think our current crop of pols have the fortitude to change it. Since it was "sold" as a retirement plan, I don't think they should. There are lots of other places to cut. jmho