Author Topic: Why the F-117 Nighthawk had such a relatively short service life  (Read 288 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rebewranger

  • Guest
Why the F-117 Nighthawk had such a relatively short service life
Team Mighty - 2h ago
 
The F-117 Nighthawk was the U.S. Air Force’s first operational stealth aircraft. It made its maiden voyage in 1981 and reached operational status by 1983. Nighthawks participated in the U.S. invasion of Panama, Operation Just Cause, in 1989, but were widely celebrated for its role in the Gulf War of 1991.

They also fought in the skies over Yugoslavia in the late 1990s, but by the early 2000s, the F-117 all but disappeared. By 2008, the Nighthawks were completely retired after just 27 years in service. Compared with planes the B-52, the C-130 and the KC-135 Stratotanker, it made for a relatively short service life.

Like many aircraft with similarly short service lives, the reason for taking the F-117 out of service is due both to inherent design issues and the rise of new weapons systems made to replace the Nighthawks.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/why-the-f-117-nighthawk-had-such-a-relatively-short-service-life/ar-AA10ihJy?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=f461ac6792fd45aa885f2ef764f3e094
« Last Edit: August 04, 2022, 11:00:36 am by rangerrebew »

Offline EdinVA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,584
  • Gender: Male
Re: Why the F-117 Nighthawk had such a relatively short service life
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2022, 11:35:53 am »
Quote
Its aerodynamics could sometimes force the wing and tail sections to come apart, an inherent flaw in the airframe design.

Yea, wings coming apart does not aid in aerodynamics....

Offline SZonian

  • Strike without warning
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,710
  • 415th Nightstalker
Re: Why the F-117 Nighthawk had such a relatively short service life
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2022, 12:21:45 pm »
"As if that wasn’t bad enough, the Nighthawk had what developers at Lockheed called a “wing failure” problem. Its aerodynamics could sometimes force the wing and tail sections to come apart, an inherent flaw in the airframe design."

I never heard a single "developer" at Lockheed claim or state this.

The one wing failure, which was in Maryland, was due to faulty maintenance.  They missed installing a number of fasteners in the structure and this started a cascading load path failure. The design was a bit complex and deemed beyond the scope of your average USAF mechanic to maintain, so that structure was redesigned.

The tail that came off was during initial flight test and again, due to maintenance.

Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.