Being a sanctuary city isn't all it's cracked up to be

[rebewranger]

Being a sanctuary city isn't all it's cracked up to be
Opinion by Zachary Faria - Yesterday 2:01 PM
 

Liberal sanctuary cities aren’t feeling so tolerant and accepting anymore as the influx of migrants being bused from Texas and Arizona are bringing the border crisis to their doors.
 
Washington D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser has requested the district's National Guard to help handle the crisis. Just 4,000 migrants have caused a “humanitarian crisis” and pushed the city to its “tipping point.” It took just 2,800 migrants for New York City Mayor Eric Adams to complain that the city’s resources were being strained. While border towns in Texas and Arizona are watching millions of migrants cross the border, big liberal cities are being brought to their knees by just a few thousand.

But isn’t this exactly what these cities and their Democratic mayors have asked for? Adams lashed out at the "callousness" of Texas and Arizona for sending migrants to the Big Apple, but Adams has proudly supported New York’s sanctuary status. He seems very upset that migrants are willingly boarding buses to go to his sanctuary city. Are they no longer welcome there?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/being-a-sanctuary-city-isn-t-all-it-s-cracked-up-to-be/ar-AA106OqY?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=ab199c2f8e804b969e7f5efcee2396f1

[IsailedawayfromFR]

This is the same attitude the east coast leftists had when busing was mandated in Southern states.

No one complained harder when it came to them than the people of Boston, who voted in some of the key drivers of social engineering and the travesty of uprooting children with forced busing.

[Free Vulcan]

Some criticized the governors for doing this, but it has blown up absolutely perfectly.