WND 7/7/2022
Remember when Hillary Clinton assured America she would accept the outcome of the 2016 election no matter what?
I do.
That promise, which she made only because Donald Trump wouldn't, was one that unequivocally meant she would not call for any recounts, that she would not call on surrogates and supporters (like Barack Obama) to make reckless allegations that Russian cyber attacks played a role in the outcome, and she would not be a party to denigrating the integrity and sanctity of the election process.
Of course, we all know what that promise was worth.
You might recall that the recounts she participated in resulted in Hillary losing more votes than she had originally – probably due to catching a proportion of the voter fraud she and her party and campaign systematically engaged in as a matter of course.
But I remember how she bellyached through four years that she was cheated out of the election. Now she is speculating that she might be tempted to run under the "new" rules of 2024 – and Democrats are pushing hard for a case that the Electoral College is "anti-democratic." Of course it is. We live in constitutional republic thanks to the wisdom of our founders.
We began to hear a lot about the Electoral College after George Bush won the presidency in 2000. In fact, there were more challenges to the constitutionality of the Electoral College than we'd seen in the previous 211 years of American presidential election history.
More:
https://www.wnd.com/2022/07/cusp-living-tyrannical-1-party-state/
