Author Topic: Glaring Inconsistency In Estimating CO2 vs. Solar Forcing Suggests CO2 Impacts Are Wildly Exaggerate  (Read 216 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rebewranger

  • Guest
Glaring Inconsistency In Estimating CO2 vs. Solar Forcing Suggests CO2 Impacts Are Wildly Exaggerated
By Kenneth Richard on 23. June 2022

Share this...
From about 11,000 to 9,000 years ago the summer solar irradiance absorbed by the Earth’s surface has been estimated to be 40-60 W/m² greater than today from latitudes 40°N to 70°N (Ullman et al., 2015). These values seriously undermine the claim CO2 is the driver of climate change.


Image Source: Ullman et al., 2015
Despite these much higher insolation values, surface temperatures have been estimated to be only a few degrees warmer than today at these latitudes during the Early Holocene.

At 77°N in High Arctic Svalbard, for example, summers were estimated to be 7°C warmer than today from 10,000 to 9,000 years ago due to this higher radiative forcing (van der Bilt et al., 2019).

https://notrickszone.com/2022/06/23/glaring-inconsistency-in-estimating-co2-vs-solar-forcing-suggests-co2-impacts-are-wildly-exaggerated/
« Last Edit: June 24, 2022, 05:30:58 pm by rangerrebew »