A Fishrrman prediction:
When tested in the courts, Mr. DeSantis' "picketing rule" is destined to fail.
I'll go so far as to predict that it could be unanimously overruled in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Let's look at the text of the First Amendment:
"...or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Where in the above "original text" is the concept of "a location" specified or defined?
Don't see anything that would restrict peaceful protests conducted in residential areas -- do you?
Is there some "penumbra" from which that can be invented?
So long as a demonstration/protest secures necessary permitting (where such permitting is required before an "assembly"), and so long as it remains peaceful, and so long as it's conducted on public property (this would exclude streets and homes in private communities), I see nothing in the First Amendment that can restrict such demonstrations or protests.
Dear reader, you're a member of this site, or otherwise reading here, because you're "of the right", are you not?
And... along the same lines... those of you who support the SECOND Amendment will consistently object to the rights recognized and secured by that amendment from being "infringed", is my assumption not correct?
Then... how can you agree with legislation that would "infringe upon" the First Amendment? Do you not agree that it should be interpreted as "original text", as originally written? Why should it be restricted?
You may point out at existing federal or state laws that restrict demonstrations in front of the homes of judges. I'm wondering if any of these laws have ever been challenged "up to" the level of the U.S. Supreme Court?
If not, I sense that they soon will be...