Author Topic: Follow the Science: But Which Results? Using Same Tree Ring Dataset, 15 Groups Come Up With 15 Diffe  (Read 96 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rebewranger

  • Guest
Follow the Science: But Which Results? Using Same Tree Ring Dataset, 15 Groups Come Up With 15 Different Reconstructions

By P Gosselin on 19. April 2022


A 2021 study appearing in Nature Communications by Buentgen et al reports on the results of a double-blind experiment of 15 different groups that yielded 15 different Northern Hemisphere summer temperature reconstructions. Each group used the same network of regional tree-ring width datasets.

What’s fascinating is that ll groups, though using the same data network, came up with a different result. When it comes to deriving temperatures from tree-rings, it has much to do with individual approach and interpretation. Sure we can follow the science, but whose results?


The 15 groups (referred to as R1–R15) were challenged with the same task of developing the most reliable NH summer temperature reconstruction for the Common Era from nine high-elevation/high-latitude TRW datasets (Fig. 1):

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/04/19/follow-the-science-but-which-results-using-same-tree-ring-dataset-15-groups-come-up-with-15-different-reconstructions/
« Last Edit: April 20, 2022, 03:56:05 pm by rangerrebew »