Now, let's see, who is more of a threat to the rule of law?
On the one side, Trump, who casts shade on the efficacy of election security and can manage to unleash an unarmed mob to harrass Congress, but wanted to enforce our immigration laws as written.
On the other, his opponents who with no authority to do so introduce a mens rea standard into the statutes governing the mishandling of classified information to avoid prosecuting his then direct opponent in an election for a manifest breach of the plain meaning of those laws, subvert the FISA court by presenting known-to-be-dubious evidence as solidly sourced to unleash the security state against a presidential campaign, use agents provocateur to create plots to discredit his supporters, can unleash mobs to destroy businesses and courthouses and then see to it none of those responsible for the destruction are prosecuted, want to ignore our immigration laws (except as applied to people from Haiti and communist countries) and who want to subvert the plain meaning of the Constitution that the legislatures of the several states have control over the conduct of elections and the selection of electors.
Hmm...
(As I told my wife, who is very anti-Trump, I'd have been and would be more anti-Trump were his opponents not so awful in their own right.)
