Doctors Coin “Vaccine-Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome,” or VAIDS

[rangerrebew]

Doctors Coin “Vaccine-Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome,” or VAIDS
 

‘If immune erosion occurs after two doses and just a few months, how can we exclude the possibility that effects of an untested “booster” will not erode more rapidly and to a greater extent?’
|

A Lancet study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated people in Sweden was conducted among 1.6 million individuals over nine months. It showed that protection against symptomatic COVID-19 declined with time, such that by six months, some of the more vulnerable vaccinated groups were at greater risk than their unvaccinated peers.

Doctors are calling this phenomena in the repeatedly vaccinated “immune erosion” or “acquired immune deficiency”, accounting for elevated incidence of myocarditis and other post-vaccine illnesses that either affect them more rapidly, resulting in death, or more slowly, resulting in chronic illness.

https://www.con-alerts.com/doctors-coin-vaccine-acquired-immune-deficiency-syndrome-or-vaids/

[Hoodat]

A Lancet study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated people in Sweden was conducted among 1.6 million individuals over nine months. It showed that protection against symptomatic COVID-19 declined with time

Maybe if they had used a real vaccine that resulted in an immune response against the virus itself instead of manufacturing one against their estimate of the protein coat, then they would have had better results.  The problem isn't that the response against the original coat was reduced.  The problem is that the coat of the current virus does not match the coat that their jab was intended for.

.  .  .  such that by six months, some of the more vulnerable vaccinated groups were at greater risk than their unvaccinated peers.

This is what happens when you inject people with something that by design suppresses their immune response.