WaPo Columnist Writes A Defense Of Government-Funded Experiments On PuppiesBrianna Lyman
Reporter
October 26, 2021 11:38 AM ET
An opinion columnist at The Washington Post defended government-funded experiments on puppies in a piece Monday because it could save “countless human lives.”
Dana Milbank wrote that several outlets had wrongly stated that a study in Tunisia which involved parasites feeding on the dogs was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), where Anthony Fauci serves as director.
The study in Tunisia involved the testing of beagle puppies, who had their heads placed in cages while sand flies were allowed to “feed on the sedated dogs for 60 minutes.”
The study was published by the National Center For Biotechnology Information (NCBI), which is one of the 27 institutes and centers that fall under the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Fauci directs the NIAID, which is separate from the NCBI but falls under the NIH.
Milbank then acknowledged that a separate study that was funded by the NIAID did experiment on beagle puppies and defended the procedures conducted during the experiments.
“NIAID-funded researchers did indeed perform cordectomies on 44 beagle puppies and euthanized them after the [separate] study,” he wrote.
“The Food and Drug Administration requires researchers to experiment on non-rodent mammals for certain classes of HIV-AIDS drugs, and for this study specifically recommended dogs” Milbank wrote. “It is necessary to use young dogs (six to eight months) to assess whether the drugs retard growth. It is mandatory that the dogs be euthanized so researchers can search for damage to organ systems.”
more
https://dailycaller.com/2021/10/26/washington-post-dana-milbank-defends-puppy-experiment/