[The Cover-Up Of Problems In The IPCC Report (by Prof. Antero Ollila) + The IPCC’s Methodology Is Fundamentally Flawed (by Ross McKitrick)]
Date: 20. August 2021Author: uwe.roland.gross 0 Comments
Sharing is caring!
There is a now a substantial number experts casting serious shade over the “flawed methodology” used by the IPCC in their latest analysis of the climate.
Below is a one-two punch to the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report (AR6).
Scientific flaws in the climate models, and the cover-up of problems in the IPCC AR6 report
[by Antero Ollila, Adj. Prof. Aalto University (Emer.) — below is an abridged version, you can find the original at climatexam.com]
The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased by 32% since 1750. According to the IPCC’s latest climate report (AR6), this is due solely to man-made emissions accumulating by an average of 44% per year, with the rest absorbed by oceans and vegetation.
Approximately 25% of the atmospheric carbon dioxide changes annually from the oceans and vegetation. As a result, less than 6% of the initial amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere remains after 10 years, and therefore the increased amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere cannot be entirely of anthropogenic origin with a permille value of -28%. The IPCC remains silent on permille values (a measure of the ratio of carbon isotopes used to analyze the origin of carbon dioxide–suitable for validating carbon cycle models).
https://climate-science.press/2021/08/20/the-cover-up-of-problems-in-the-ipcc-report-by-prof-antero-ollila-the-ipccs-methodology-is-fundamentally-flawed-by-ross-mckitrick/
