Author Topic: Nuclear Artillery: NATO’s Best Defense or a Recipe for Armageddon?  (Read 517 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
 August 7, 2021

Nuclear Artillery: NATO’s Best Defense or a Recipe for Armageddon?

Today the use of nuclear weapons is a near-unthinkable military option of last resort. But back in the 1950s, that norm had yet to be established.
by Sebastien Roblin

Here's What You Need to Know: The Davy Crocketts were withdrawn from operational units by 1968. While the Army retained nuclear artillery shells for several more decades, the passing of the Pentomic division marked the turning point when the Pentagon realized modern war wouldn’t necessarily involve a liberal sprinkling of little mushroom clouds—an epiphany we should all be thankful for.

Today the use of nuclear weapons is a near-unthinkable military option of last resort. But back in the 1950s, that norm had yet to be established. The U.S. Army believed then that in the event of war with the Soviet Union, tactical nukes would be landing left and right across the battlefield. It therefore fielded the “Pentomic” division to fight on the anticipated nuclear hellscape. It even gave battalion-level commanders access to short-range nuclear shells, which risked blasting the units that fired them.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/nuclear-artillery-nato%E2%80%99s-best-defense-or-recipe-armageddon-191429