CDC: 74% who got Covid-19 and most who were hospitalized in recent analysis had been fully vaccinate

[Hoodat]

CDC: 74% who got Covid-19 and most who were hospitalized in recent analysis had been fully vaccinated.

SHARYL ATTKISSON   |   JULY 30, 2021

It's getting more difficult to scientifically blame the unvaccinated for all of the Covid-19 ills hitting the U.S. and other countries.

According to a new analysis by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), most of the people who got Covid-19, as well as almost all of those who were hospitalized, had been fully vaccinated.

The report contradicts multiple false reports that have claimed the vaccines are "100% effective" in preventing hospitalization. It also contradicts false reports that have implied vaccinated people are not spreading Covid-19. According to CDC, the fully vaccinated are showing just as high of a "viral load" as unvaccinated people who get infected.  .  .  .

.  .  .  Additionally, four of five hospitalized patients were fully vaccinated. Only one was not fully vaccinated.

https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/07/read-cdc-74-who-got-covid-19-in-a-recent-analysis-had-been-fully-vaccinated/


So yet another lie is exposed.  The jab does not make symptoms less severe in the event of an infection.  It is looking like the opposite could be true.

[libertybele]

CDC: 74% who got Covid-19 and most who were hospitalized in recent analysis had been fully vaccinated.

SHARYL ATTKISSON   |   JULY 30, 2021

It's getting more difficult to scientifically blame the unvaccinated for all of the Covid-19 ills hitting the U.S. and other countries.

According to a new analysis by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), most of the people who got Covid-19, as well as almost all of those who were hospitalized, had been fully vaccinated.

The report contradicts multiple false reports that have claimed the vaccines are "100% effective" in preventing hospitalization. It also contradicts false reports that have implied vaccinated people are not spreading Covid-19. According to CDC, the fully vaccinated are showing just as high of a "viral load" as unvaccinated people who get infected.  .  .  .

.  .  .  Additionally, four of five hospitalized patients were fully vaccinated. Only one was not fully vaccinated.

https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/07/read-cdc-74-who-got-covid-19-in-a-recent-analysis-had-been-fully-vaccinated/


So yet another lie is exposed.  The jab does not make symptoms less severe in the event of an infection. It is looking like the opposite could be true.

Exactly; it looks like it may actually weaken the natural immunity.

[jmyrlefuller]

So we're going to take a single, cherry-picked case study, which provides zero proof of vaccinated-to-vaccinated transmission? Because this vaccine was the last resort to achieve lasting control, after masks failed, after lockdown failed, after test-and-trace failed miserably. If the vaccine has failed, and you know full well booster shots are going to have far less uptake than the first round meaning that you'll never get the full national coverage needed for vaccine-based herd immunity, then there's no way to get rid of this virus, and thus no way for the government to be convinced to end this charade. (They will actively suppress revolt using things they learned from January 6 to stop anyone from standing up again.)

What reason do I have to believe I will ever be free again, short of jumping off a bridge?

[Hoodat]

So we're going to take a single, cherry-picked case study

Cherry picked by the CDC.  A study that refutes their own argument for getting jabbed.  And it isn't the only study.  Several studies have been posted here.

which provides zero proof of vaccinated-to-vaccinated transmission?

Who said anything about jabbed-to-jabbed transmission?  The point here is that vaccinated people are becoming infected (from infected people), are being hospitalized, and are dying.  In addition, they are becoming the majority of the latter two groups.

[Smokin Joe]

Cherry picked by the CDC.  A study that refutes their own argument for getting jabbed.  And it isn't the only study.  Several studies have been posted here.


Who said anything about jabbed-to-jabbed transmission?  The point here is that vaccinated people are becoming infected (from infected people), are being hospitalized, and are dying.  In addition, they are becoming the majority of the latter two groups.

With the assumption that that is correct (for the sake of speculation), the salient question is "Why?"

One of the postulated effects of the original variant of COVID-19, which accounted for diffuse blood clots in the lungs was that a Cytokine Storm had actually been the mechanism of death--where the immune system went nuts and attacked healthy cells as well as the pathogen.
One of the effects of the Macrolide antibiotics recommended in the two most prominent (censored) treatment regimens is to mute the immune response slightly, helping prevent a severe cytokine response.

I am curious if the spike protein or mRNA cause this sort of problem, where the immune system becomes hypersensitive to the pathogen and responds out of control.

[libertybele]

What reason would anyone have to believe the CDC, WHO or team Fauci?

These vaccines supposedly went through testing did they not?

HCQ in some studies has been shown to work as a treatment and Ivermectin as well.  There has been silence on treatments and the focus has been on pushing everyone to get vaccinated (except for those coming across the border).   

Booster shot anyone?  IMO I think people need to pass. I also heard that the vaccines are supposed to get full FDA approval by September.  How, when the vaccines obviously don't work?

[Hoodat]

With the assumption that that is correct (for the sake of speculation), the salient question is "Why?"

The big 'why' question to me is why are they pushing even harder for everyone to get the mRNA jab when the data is beginning to show a worse outcome for those jabbed.

[libertybele]

The big 'why' question to me is why are they pushing even harder for everyone to get the mRNA jab when the data is beginning to show a worse outcome for those jabbed.

That a very valid question. What I find very troubling is that they are pushing our youth to get the vaccine. So at this point I continue to wonder what is truly in those vaccines?

[Smokin Joe]

The big 'why' question to me is why are they pushing even harder for everyone to get the mRNA jab when the data is beginning to show a worse outcome for those jabbed.

Considering, in my county, there is one active case per 93.4 square miles, and that I'd have to meet (statistically, of course) over 1000 people in order to meet one of those active cases (assuming, for the sake of argument, they'd be running around in the thick of things evenly distributed in the population, which is unlikely if you are sick), I'll take my chances. (Latest ND DOH numbers, county population figures).

I suspect that prior to FDA approval, they will retain their liability waiver, afterwards, that'd be difficult to keep if the FDA says the jabs are okay.

The vaccines ARE going through testing.
I will remain in the control group.

Funny how everyone wanted double blind studies of HCQ and Ivermectin (which were only one part of their respective regimens) but the push is on to get the jab.