Gate keepers must be gatekeepers. Anything less impugns their authority. Their authority comes first.
Authority is only a means to an end. At the end of that long, dark, hallway is a profit motive.
In this instance, they are not gatekeepers, but dogs in the manger.
A relative taking hydroxychloroquine for seven years, now, is having difficulty in getting prescriptions filled. This is for an ON label use for the drug.
Sources I have used for years for veterinary antibiotics suddenly no longer make them, causing shortages of antibiotics like doxycycline, erythromycin, Azithromycin, and others in the veterinary markets which may be of benefit and are noted as part of treatment regimens the medical establishment has been working to discredit.
Ivermectin dosages used in studies which found no benefit were multiples of ordinary clinical doses. Studies with more normal dosages found significantly better outcomes among the cohort who received treatment.
Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine dosages in studies which found little or no benefit were approaching, and in one case, exceeded toxicity limits--again, multiples of ordinary clinical dosages. Almost a guarantee of adverse effects, especially the lengthening of the Q-T interval to the point where impaired heart function can be lethal.
I must note that for any drug that may have harmful side effects, taking
more is almost a guarantee that those harmful side effects will be seen, and occur in far greater frequency and severity than they would with normal dosages.
I am convinced that was done either out of stupidity or intentionally to discredit the concept of using those drugs as ionophores and antivirals. Considering those dosages are easily researched, I am leaning toward intentionally, rather than mere medical incompetence which would be displayed in the journals for all to see.
In none of those overdosed studies was zinc supplementation administered, yet patients deficient in zinc have been shown to have less desirable clinical outcomes. Zinc has well known and documented antiviral effects.
While my experience with doctors has been mixed, some good, some bad, I can no longer trust the medical establishment nor the medical press for good information, but have to examine the studies myself.
There has been a concerted counter current against treatment options, which appears to have been designed to promote the mRNA shots, shots we are finding ineffective against variants. If reduction in severity and duration of infection can be achieved by an inexpensive and off-the-shelf treatment (and natural immunity acquired), the only reason not to use those means (aside from individual cases where the medication is contraindicated) is because those drugs are all generic at this point and there is no profit in it, unlike new alleged prophylactics which carry no liability and new treatments which are under patent and make money.
The result, aside from the biggest science fair project in history in which the willing are all human lab rats, is that those denied treatment have fared less well, and statistically, worldwide, over a million people have died who might well have recovered.
I will remain with the control group, and avoid the jab as long as humanly possible.
For those who buy into the population reduction theories flying about, that obviously isn't enough of a body count to significantly reduce the world's population, albeit enough to induce near universal fear, especially with the constant media incitement that has been the hallmark of the pandemic from nearly day one.
To peek down that rabbit hole for just a second, what would be the end game to achieve that end?
